Skip to content

Conversation

AlinaWithAFace
Copy link
Contributor

You can see the results here, but basically I rebuilt all of the documentation to work with gitbook since it's a bit more user-friendly compared to READMEs scattered throughout folders.

Copy link
Contributor

@jselstad jselstad left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wow, this looks great! Gitbook is a huge visual upgrade over the standard Github readmes.

A couple questions:

  • Is this missing a book.json?
  • How is ownership of the pages managed with respect to gitbook.io? My current impression is that we'll need to initialize a separate Gitbook.io instance from your staging deployment.

Once the pieces below and the merge conflicts are fixed (and @fmaurer approves), I see no reason not to merge this.

@jselstad jselstad requested a review from fmaurer August 23, 2019 22:29
@AlinaWithAFace
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've only been working with gitbook for the past month or so using their webapp client, so admittedly I don't know if it's missing a book.json or not, or what it would look like.
They apparently use some sort of teams system, again via their webapp. I'd be happy to add leap motion staff to what I've already set up if you'd like to keep the domains (I'd need emails!), or you should be able to connect another instance via their github integration.

BryanChrisBrown and others added 30 commits March 4, 2021 01:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants