Skip to content

Lock file maintenance #1842

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Apr 21, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Update Change
lockFileMaintenance All locks refreshed

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 5am on monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Apr 21, 2025

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: Gemfile.lock

/opt/containerbase/tools/bundler/2.1.4/3.4.5/gems/bundler-2.1.4/lib/bundler/vendor/thor/lib/thor/error.rb:105:in '<class:Thor>': uninitialized constant DidYouMean::SPELL_CHECKERS (NameError)

    DidYouMean::SPELL_CHECKERS.merge!(
              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Did you mean?  DidYouMean::SpellChecker
	from /opt/containerbase/tools/bundler/2.1.4/3.4.5/gems/bundler-2.1.4/lib/bundler/vendor/thor/lib/thor/error.rb:1:in '<top (required)>'
	from /opt/containerbase/tools/bundler/2.1.4/3.4.5/gems/bundler-2.1.4/lib/bundler/vendor/thor/lib/thor/base.rb:3:in 'Kernel#require_relative'
	from /opt/containerbase/tools/bundler/2.1.4/3.4.5/gems/bundler-2.1.4/lib/bundler/vendor/thor/lib/thor/base.rb:3:in '<top (required)>'
	from /opt/containerbase/tools/bundler/2.1.4/3.4.5/gems/bundler-2.1.4/lib/bundler/vendor/thor/lib/thor.rb:2:in 'Kernel#require_relative'
	from /opt/containerbase/tools/bundler/2.1.4/3.4.5/gems/bundler-2.1.4/lib/bundler/vendor/thor/lib/thor.rb:2:in '<top (required)>'
	from /opt/containerbase/tools/bundler/2.1.4/3.4.5/gems/bundler-2.1.4/lib/bundler/vendored_thor.rb:8:in 'Kernel#require_relative'
	from /opt/containerbase/tools/bundler/2.1.4/3.4.5/gems/bundler-2.1.4/lib/bundler/vendored_thor.rb:8:in '<top (required)>'
	from /opt/containerbase/tools/bundler/2.1.4/3.4.5/gems/bundler-2.1.4/lib/bundler/friendly_errors.rb:3:in 'Kernel#require_relative'
	from /opt/containerbase/tools/bundler/2.1.4/3.4.5/gems/bundler-2.1.4/lib/bundler/friendly_errors.rb:3:in '<top (required)>'
	from /opt/containerbase/tools/bundler/2.1.4/3.4.5/gems/bundler-2.1.4/exe/bundle:29:in 'Kernel#require_relative'
	from /opt/containerbase/tools/bundler/2.1.4/3.4.5/gems/bundler-2.1.4/exe/bundle:29:in '<top (required)>'
	from /opt/containerbase/tools/bundler/2.1.4/3.4.5/gems/bundler-2.1.4/exe/bundler:4:in 'Kernel#load'
	from /opt/containerbase/tools/bundler/2.1.4/3.4.5/gems/bundler-2.1.4/exe/bundler:4:in '<top (required)>'
	from /opt/containerbase/tools/bundler/2.1.4/3.4.5/bin/bundler:25:in 'Kernel#load'
	from /opt/containerbase/tools/bundler/2.1.4/3.4.5/bin/bundler:25:in '<main>'

@renovate renovate bot requested review from dhmlau and achrinza as code owners April 21, 2025 03:09
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch 3 times, most recently from 9e2ca3a to 660f38f Compare April 26, 2025 19:13
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch 2 times, most recently from 5458a86 to b5f716a Compare May 1, 2025 17:35
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch 4 times, most recently from ffacf1c to d5d5405 Compare May 15, 2025 13:11
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch 9 times, most recently from a711dff to caed2f3 Compare May 23, 2025 16:52
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch 4 times, most recently from 0fc262b to 97e3018 Compare June 7, 2025 05:49
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch 5 times, most recently from 7e075e2 to 5de4676 Compare June 17, 2025 05:41
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch 6 times, most recently from 1333385 to 75541ef Compare July 8, 2025 03:26
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch 6 times, most recently from 15ba483 to a5be2da Compare July 22, 2025 04:40
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch 4 times, most recently from f7b87b3 to 2028396 Compare July 30, 2025 07:28
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch 5 times, most recently from 65c335f to 3217719 Compare August 5, 2025 21:29
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch 6 times, most recently from 0881a92 to 1bc7ca7 Compare August 17, 2025 12:47
Signed-off-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch from 1bc7ca7 to 6b96d95 Compare August 18, 2025 16:37
@dhmlau dhmlau closed this Aug 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant