Skip to content

Conversation

miljance
Copy link
Contributor

@miljance miljance commented Oct 14, 2025

Summary

Continuation of microsoft/ALAppExtensions#29070

New stuff:

  • New Workflow Template
  • Setting the status to Exported for E-Document.

@Groenbech96 Can you check if the new changes fit? I really need an estimate if it is ok to introduce a new status named "Exported" for an E-Document.

Work Item(s)

Fixes #5004

Fixes AB#580686

@miljance miljance requested a review from a team as a code owner October 14, 2025 22:05
@github-actions github-actions bot added From Fork Pull request is coming from a fork Linked Issue is linked to a Azure Boards work item labels Oct 14, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the Version 28.0 milestone Oct 14, 2025
@Groenbech96
Copy link
Contributor

@miljance if goal is to enable functionality to export document with no further action, then we should already support that now with "WorkflowResponseHandling.AddResponseToLibrary(ResponseEDocExport(), Database::"E-Document", ExportEdocUsingSetupLbl, 'GROUP 50100'); "

E-Document Created -> Export E-Document in workflow.

That would leave it in Exported state, and not sent.
Then manual action can be triggered on e-document to send it to provider.

Would you need it to somehow automatically be picked up for sending? And what would be the criteria?

@miljance
Copy link
Contributor Author

@miljance if goal is to enable functionality to export document with no further action, then we should already support that now with "WorkflowResponseHandling.AddResponseToLibrary(ResponseEDocExport(), Database::"E-Document", ExportEdocUsingSetupLbl, 'GROUP 50100'); "

E-Document Created -> Export E-Document in workflow.

That would leave it in Exported state, and not sent. Then manual action can be triggered on e-document to send it to provider.

Would you need it to somehow automatically be picked up for sending? And what would be the criteria?

Makes sense from my side, glad to revert it. But why did you ask for a new response previously?

image

@Groenbech96
Copy link
Contributor

But why did you ask for a new response previously?

I was trying to figure out if this would overlap.

@JesperSchulz JesperSchulz added the Integration GitHub request for Integration area label Oct 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

From Fork Pull request is coming from a fork Integration GitHub request for Integration area Linked Issue is linked to a Azure Boards work item

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BC Idea]: Two steps processing for E-Documents in the sales process

3 participants