Skip to content

docs: fix copy/paste error from test.fail #36737

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 24, 2025
Merged

Conversation

msorens
Copy link
Contributor

@msorens msorens commented Jul 21, 2025

The docs for test.skip had some copy/paste errors that originated from test.fail.
This PR corrects the test.skip documentation; the erroneous portions are highlighted:

image

Copy link
Contributor

Test results for "tests 1"

8 flaky ⚠️ [firefox-library] › library/inspector/cli-codegen-1.spec.ts:1079:7 › cli codegen › should not throw csp directive violation errors @firefox-ubuntu-22.04-node18
⚠️ [firefox-page] › page/page-event-request.spec.ts:182:3 › should return response body when Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy is set @firefox-ubuntu-22.04-node18
⚠️ [playwright-test] › ui-mode-test-watch.spec.ts:145:5 › should watch all @ubuntu-latest-node18-1
⚠️ [playwright-test] › ui-mode-test-watch.spec.ts:145:5 › should watch all @ubuntu-latest-node20-1
⚠️ [playwright-test] › ui-mode-test-watch.spec.ts:145:5 › should watch all @ubuntu-latest-node22-1
⚠️ [playwright-test] › ui-mode-test-watch.spec.ts:145:5 › should watch all @ubuntu-latest-node24-1
⚠️ [webkit-library] › library/video.spec.ts:441:5 › screencast › should work for popups @webkit-ubuntu-22.04-node18
⚠️ [playwright-test] › ui-mode-test-watch.spec.ts:145:5 › should watch all @windows-latest-node18-1

46759 passed, 926 skipped
✔️✔️✔️

Merge workflow run.

@mxschmitt
Copy link
Member

@msorens please sign the CLA - otherwise we are not able to merge. Thanks!

@msorens
Copy link
Contributor Author

msorens commented Jul 24, 2025

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree

@mxschmitt mxschmitt merged commit 6c23a74 into microsoft:main Jul 24, 2025
32 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants