Skip to content

Conversation

olaservo
Copy link
Member

Motivation and Context

We recently added Claude to the reference servers repo with these settings, so I think we can apply the same settings here to open up the action to more people for testing in this repo.

How Has This Been Tested?

Same config has been added to the reference servers repo and its been useful there from testing it there so far.

Breaking Changes

No

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

If we do see people spamming this or any other concerns, lets raise them in the Discord maintainer channel. I think we can also add some additional instructions here to help with creating a more consistent PR template in the near future, but for now lets merge as-is.

@olaservo olaservo requested a review from cliffhall August 26, 2025 19:15
Copy link
Member

@cliffhall cliffhall left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! 👍

Appears to be the same as the one now operating in the Servers repo.

@cliffhall cliffhall dismissed their stale review August 26, 2025 19:24

meant to choose approve

@cliffhall cliffhall merged commit 7fc4e87 into modelcontextprotocol:main Aug 26, 2025
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants