Skip to content

Conversation

@inclyc
Copy link
Member

@inclyc inclyc commented Nov 19, 2024

Basic support for option completion on the worker process. This is the premise for doing this in LSP.

Link: #507

@inclyc inclyc requested a review from Mic92 November 19, 2024 08:45
@Mic92
Copy link
Member

Mic92 commented Nov 19, 2024

@inclyc did you request my review for something specific or more for a general review?

@inclyc
Copy link
Member Author

inclyc commented Nov 19, 2024

@inclyc did you request my review for something specific or more for a general review?

A specific review for C++ nix IPC:

This pull request introduces the ability to query builtins information. Do you think the methodology is correct, or does it need refinement?

Very appreciated if you can take a look :)

@Mic92
Copy link
Member

Mic92 commented Nov 19, 2024

It looks reasonable to me and similar to what the nix repl does for completing. However I would prefer if @roberth would have a look as well.


/// \brief Get nix's `builtins` constant
inline nix::Value &getBuiltins(const nix::EvalState &State) {
return *State.baseEnv.values[0];
Copy link
Member

@Mic92 Mic92 Nov 20, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would do add a TODO now that this could use the proper api in the next nix version.

@inclyc inclyc marked this pull request as draft November 21, 2024 03:14
@PriceHiller
Copy link

Hey! Checking in here.

What all needs to be done to get this working?

More than happy to get the ball rolling assuming I can be of any help.

@inclyc
Copy link
Member Author

inclyc commented Feb 17, 2025

Hey! Checking in here.

What all needs to be done to get this working?

More than happy to get the ball rolling assuming I can be of any help.

Actually, this PR is related to the technical approach of #625. I’m considering proposing a technical solution that would work well for both #625 and this PR, but I haven’t had the time to write the code recently. If you’re interested, you could explore the connection between the technical approaches of these two PRs and help move this work forward.

@inclyc inclyc force-pushed the support-builtins branch from 24792c1 to af12b9c Compare April 26, 2025 15:56
@inclyc
Copy link
Member Author

inclyc commented Apr 26, 2025

Rebased. Resolving merge conflicts.

@inclyc inclyc closed this May 4, 2025
@inclyc
Copy link
Member Author

inclyc commented May 4, 2025

Closed, prefer #677

@inclyc inclyc deleted the support-builtins branch May 4, 2025 14:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants