Skip to content

Expose validators #109

Description

@JBBianchi

What would you like to be added:
Expose validators in a more "userfriendly" way, without having to use type name strings.

Why is this needed:
See #84 & #94

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

enhancementNew feature or requestlegacyRelated to the pre-v1.0.0 Serverless Workflow specification

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions