Skip to content

Conversation

@TedTed
Copy link
Contributor

@TedTed TedTed commented Oct 24, 2025

One more step for #23.

Also fixes the logic and misleading documentation of said handling of special values, which resolves #101, and tests the special value handling logic much more thoroughly.

I also removed some documentation on QueryExpr classes that was redundant with the QueryBuilder (which should be the source of truth).

@TedTed TedTed marked this pull request as ready for review October 27, 2025 17:17
@TedTed TedTed requested review from Maegereg and tmager October 27, 2025 17:17
Copy link
Contributor Author

@TedTed TedTed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

addressing simple comments first, will add more tests for privacy IDs & joins later

@TedTed TedTed requested a review from Maegereg October 29, 2025 15:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Handling of infinity values does not match the documentation

3 participants