Skip to content

Conversation

sendaoYan
Copy link
Member

@sendaoYan sendaoYan commented Jul 16, 2025

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit cbb3d23e from the openjdk/jdk repository to jdk25.

Test-fix only to improves test performance and stability. Change has been verified locally, no risk.

Thanks!


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8361827: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java throws OutOfMemoryError (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26343/head:pull/26343
$ git checkout pull/26343

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26343
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26343/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26343

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26343

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26343.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 16, 2025

👋 Welcome back syan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into jdk25 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 16, 2025

@sendaoYan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8361827: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java throws OutOfMemoryError

Reviewed-by: rrich, lmesnik

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 12 new commits pushed to the jdk25 branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the jdk25 branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport cbb3d23e19a8a893bf2fbda03e7bda4f4b7a59a6 8361827: [TESTBUG] serviceability/HeapDump/UnmountedVThreadNativeMethodAtTop.java throws OutOfMemoryError Jul 16, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 16, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 16, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 16, 2025

@sendaoYan The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 16, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 16, 2025
*/
@BeforeEach
void doGC() {
System.gc();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Systen.gc() might not trigger full GC.

While not tjust o restrict heap for this test? 256M should be enough.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Systen.gc() might not trigger full GC.

Indeed. Might be better to use the Whitebox or start a dedicated VM.

While not tjust o restrict heap for this test? 256M should be enough.

This would not help. The tests accumulate heap dumps until OOM. See reproducer.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It might not be the perfect solution but it surely reduces the noise in our testing.
So let's have this improvement in jdk25.
In jdk26 we can change the test to use WhiteBox::fullGC. What do you think?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've created a draft pr: #26363

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's fine.

*/
@BeforeEach
void doGC() {
System.gc();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's fine.

@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @lmesnik @reinrich

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 18, 2025

Going to push as commit e599ee4.
Since your change was applied there have been 14 commits pushed to the jdk25 branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 18, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 18, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 18, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 18, 2025

@sendaoYan Pushed as commit e599ee4.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required integrated Pull request has been integrated serviceability [email protected]
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants