-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8354871: Replace stack map frame type magics with constants #27029
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back fandreuz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@fandreuz This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 93 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@liach) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
Webrevs
|
Hi @liach, could you have a look at this PR? |
ITEM_BOGUS = -1; | ||
|
||
public static final int | ||
SAME_FRAME_END = 63, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add a comment on these constants that they are inclusive on both ends? A lot of ranges in Java are open on their higher end, like range notations in Arrays.copyOf or String.substring.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure: 0c6c04b
src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/classfile/impl/StackMapDecoder.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/classfile/impl/StackMapGenerator.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Thanks for pinging me. This must have got forgotten in the stream of emails. |
Co-authored-by: Chen Liang <[email protected]>
Reviewer's note: This brings more parity with c++ verifier code as done in JDK-8359920 (28e96e3) |
Thanks for the review @liach |
/integrate |
I will wait for the CI results before integration. |
Tier 1-3 looks good. /sponsor |
Going to push as commit 8a6b875.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
In this PR I introduce some constants in
StackMapGenerator
. No change in logic is expected.Passes tests in
jdk/classfile
.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27029/head:pull/27029
$ git checkout pull/27029
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27029
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27029/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27029
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27029
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27029.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment