Skip to content

Conversation

albertnetymk
Copy link
Member

@albertnetymk albertnetymk commented Sep 1, 2025

Trivial changing to use the correct includes in numberSeq.hpp/cpp.

Test: tier1


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8366543: Clean up include headers in numberSeq (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27031/head:pull/27031
$ git checkout pull/27031

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27031
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27031/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27031

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27031

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27031.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@albertnetymk
Copy link
Member Author

/cc hotspot-gc

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 1, 2025

👋 Welcome back ayang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 1, 2025

@albertnetymk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8366543: Clean up include headers in numberSeq

Reviewed-by: tschatzl

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 30 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8366543 8366543: Clean up include headers in numberSeq Sep 1, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 1, 2025

@albertnetymk
The hotspot-gc label was successfully added.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 1, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 1, 2025

Webrevs

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
#ifndef SHARE_UTILITIES_NUMBERSEQ_HPP
#define SHARE_UTILITIES_NUMBERSEQ_HPP

#include "memory/allocation.hpp"
#include "utilities/ostream.hpp"
Copy link
Contributor

@tschatzl tschatzl Sep 1, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CHeapObj is from allocation.hpp. So the original include is correct.

Instead of including the other header just for outputStream, better forward-declare it in the .hpp file here and include it in the cpp file.

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
*
*/

#include "memory/allocation.inline.hpp"
#include "memory/allocation.hpp"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My rule is if there is a .inline.hpp file, always include it instead of the .hpp file in the .cpp to be sure to catch everything (the inline.hpp always includes the .hpp); and the allocation.hpp must already be included in numberSeq.hpp.

This just gives headaches imo when more code is moved to the .inline.hpp file. It works this time because nothing from CHeapObj is in the inline.hpp file, so technically the removal of this include entirely works (as mentioned in the other comment, numberSeq.hpp needs to include allocation.hpp).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 3, 2025
@albertnetymk
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for review.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 3, 2025

Going to push as commit 6dda2f6.
Since your change was applied there have been 30 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 3, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 3, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 3, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 3, 2025

@albertnetymk Pushed as commit 6dda2f6.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@albertnetymk albertnetymk deleted the num-seq-header branch September 3, 2025 07:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants