Skip to content

Conversation

eme64
Copy link
Contributor

@eme64 eme64 commented Sep 2, 2025

Analysis

A CastP2X without ctrl can float. If it floats over a SafePoint (or call), we may GC and move the oop. But the CastP2X value does not end up on the oop-map, and so the pointer is stale (old).

With StressGCM, the aliasing runtime check has one CastP2X that floats over the SafePoint, and another that stays after the SafePoint. Both read the oop of the same array, so instead of getting the same address, we now get the old and the new oop. And so the aliasing runtime check passes (thinks there is no aliasing), even though there is aliasing. We end up vectorizing, which reorders the loads/stores and would only be safe if there is no aliasing.

Fix: add control to the CastP2X so that it cannot float too far.

Details

rbp = Allcoate array
spill <- rbp + 0x20

call to allocateArrays
-> allocates a lot, and triggers GC. That moves the allocated array behind rbp
-> rbp is oop-mapped, so it is updated automatically to the new oop
-> spill value remains based on the old oop

We now compute the aliasing runtime check:
-> one side of the comparison is computed from rbp (new oop)
-> the other side is computed from the the spill value (old oop)
-> the cmp returns a nonsensical value, and we take the wrong branch
-> vectorize even though we have aliasing!

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8366490: C2 SuperWord: wrong result because CastP2X is missing ctrl and floats over SafePoint creating stale oops (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27045/head:pull/27045
$ git checkout pull/27045

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27045
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27045/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27045

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27045

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27045.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 2, 2025

👋 Welcome back epeter! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 2, 2025

@eme64 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8366490: C2 SuperWord: wrong result because CastP2X is missing ctrl and floats over SafePoint creating stale oops

Reviewed-by: thartmann, chagedorn, mhaessig

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 20 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title JDK-8366490 8366490: Incorrect result with C2 compiled code Sep 2, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 2, 2025

@eme64 The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@eme64 eme64 changed the title 8366490: Incorrect result with C2 compiled code 8366490: C2 SuperWord: wrong result because CastP2X is missing ctrl and floats over SafePoint creating stale oops Sep 2, 2025
@eme64 eme64 marked this pull request as ready for review September 2, 2025 12:28
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 2, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 2, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice analysis! Looks good to me.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 2, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@mhaessig mhaessig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the fix and the easy to follow analysis, @eme64. I just have a few minor comments. Otherwise, this looks good.

for (int i = 0; 200_000 > i; ++i) {
int[] a = new int[N];
}
// Makes GC more likely.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No clue if this is the right use case, but maybe this would be a good use of -XX:+GCALot?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe, you could be right!

Copy link
Member

@chhagedorn chhagedorn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Otherwise, looks good to me, too!

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 2, 2025
Co-authored-by: Manuel Hässig <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Christian Hagedorn <[email protected]>
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 2, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler [email protected] ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants