8315990: Amend problemlisted tests to proper position

[GoeLin]

I backport this for parity with 21.0.10-oracle.

Fix JDK-8280392 for NonfocusableOwnerTest.java which removed the entry already backported.

Omitted corresponding entry.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• JDK-8315990 needs maintainer approval

Issue

• JDK-8315990: Amend problemlisted tests to proper position (Bug - P4 - Requested)

Reviewers

• Richard Reingruber (@reinrich - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2434/head:pull/2434
$ git checkout pull/2434

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2434
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2434/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2434

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2434

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2434.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 01: Full - Incremental (46c46748)
• 00: Full (e58bf521)

[reinrich]

You left out also moving these awt related entries to the awt section. I think you should do that.

[GoeLin]

You left out also moving these awt related entries to the awt section. I think you should do that.

Thanks, fixed. I wonder how I missed that, as I added the new comment ...

[reinrich]

Looks good.
Cheers, Richard.

[openjdk]

⚠️ @GoeLin This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.