-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 210
OCPBUGS-57585: CVO protects /metrics with authorization #1215
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
openshift-merge-bot
merged 2 commits into
openshift:main
from
hongkailiu:OCPBUGS-57585-TokenReview
Aug 6, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I read the code and noticed that we would only support Bearer token auth but I remember from the handbook we are supposed to auth a cert-presenting client:
It seems that it is actually us telling the monitoring stack how it should auth to us through the
ServiceMonitormanifest.spec.endpoints[].bearerTokenFile.In that aspect this PR is incomplete but maybe doing just Bearer token auth is fine for a fast OCPBUGS-57585 bandaid that allows us to start backporting, and we would tackle the cert auth separately and only forwards (not necessary to backport). But also:
😬
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shortly after the discussion in our meeting, I realized i have done the same thing in ci-tools for the same reason: We do not want to reply on K8S API server for scraping because it is too slow and it may create burden for K8S API server.
I will create a card to replace the deprecated
servicemonitor.spec.endpoints.bearerTokenFilewithservicemonitor.spec.endpoints.authorizationand I will argue in the card that with a solution that addresses the concern above and we do not need to move to the cert-based auth. But that is not in the scope of this pull. I will move the discussion there.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OTA-1594