-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 226
Support AMD SEV-SNP on AWS #1420
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@fangge1212: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
f2bdae6
to
d90c629
Compare
{ | ||
testCase: "with confidentialCompute empty", | ||
modifySpec: func(p *machinev1beta1.AWSMachineProviderConfig) { | ||
p.CPUOptions = &machinev1beta1.CPUOptions{ | ||
ConfidentialCompute: ptr.To(machinev1beta1.AWSConfidentialComputePolicy("")), | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
expectedOk: true, | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would not have expected this to be a valid case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you mean this should be a negative scenario?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correct. Because the set of allowed values in the API definition do not allow this to be explicitly set to the empty string (""
) this should not be an allowed configuration.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated.
…onfig This change introduces webhook validation for the CPUOptions field in AWSMachineProviderConfig. The validation ensures that if cpuOptions is provided, its confidentialCompute value is either empty or one of the supported policies: - Disabled - AMDEncryptedVirtualizationNestedPaging Signed-off-by: Fangge Jin <[email protected]>
d90c629
to
4d91e07
Compare
This change introduces webhook validation for the CPUOptions field in AWSMachineProviderConfig. The validation ensures that if cpuOptions is provided, its confidentialCompute value is either empty or one of the supported policies: