Skip to content

Conversation

@pablintino
Copy link
Contributor

- What I did

This change adds the OSImageStream controller and the additional logic required to introduce OSImageStreams into the MCO.

- How to verify it

Self-verified by the associated UTs.

- Description for the changelog

This change adds the OSImageStream controller and the additional logic required to introduce OSImageStreams into the MCO.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Dec 1, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 1, 2025

@pablintino: This pull request references MCO-1961 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

- What I did

This change adds the OSImageStream controller and the additional logic required to introduce OSImageStreams into the MCO.

- How to verify it

Self-verified by the associated UTs.

- Description for the changelog

This change adds the OSImageStream controller and the additional logic required to introduce OSImageStreams into the MCO.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 1, 2025
@pablintino pablintino force-pushed the mco-1961-osimagestream-controller branch 2 times, most recently from c3314f8 to a565e57 Compare December 1, 2025 13:13
@umohnani8
Copy link
Contributor

Changes LGTM

This change adds the OSImageStream controller and the additional logic
required to introduce OSImageStreams into the MCO.
@pablintino pablintino force-pushed the mco-1961-osimagestream-controller branch from a565e57 to c2e23bb Compare December 1, 2025 15:19
Copy link
Member

@isabella-janssen isabella-janssen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

These changes looks clear to me & make sense. The new unit tests seem to cover the added functionality well & are passing.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 1, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 1, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: isabella-janssen, pablintino

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [isabella-janssen,pablintino]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@pablintino
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-hypershift

1 similar comment
@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-hypershift

@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

This shouldn't affect hypershift since the controller doesn't run

/override ci/prow/e2e-hypershift

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 1, 2025

@yuqi-zhang: Overrode contexts on behalf of yuqi-zhang: ci/prow/e2e-hypershift

In response to this:

This shouldn't affect hypershift since the controller doesn't run

/override ci/prow/e2e-hypershift

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 2, 2025

@pablintino: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/bootstrap-unit c2e23bb link false /test bootstrap-unit

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@pablintino
Copy link
Contributor Author

/verified by @pablintino

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Dec 2, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@pablintino: This PR has been marked as verified by @pablintino.

In response to this:

/verified by @pablintino

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 8649284 into openshift:main Dec 2, 2025
13 of 14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants