-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
[release-4.16] OCPBUGS-58881: operatorgroup: ensure clusterroleselectors in clusterrole aggregation rules are sorted #1102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58881, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58881, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/test all |
… rules are sorted (#3593) Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <[email protected]> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 3558fae23fb2157270f5f676ddfe5647def8f157 Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <[email protected]>
c9c1481
to
25d15cb
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: perdasilva The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/verified by @jianzhangbjz |
@jianzhangbjz: This PR has been marked as verified by In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58881, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
@perdasilva: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
e48ec38
into
openshift:release-4.16
@perdasilva: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58881 Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58881 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: operator-registry |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: operator-lifecycle-manager |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: ose-operator-framework-tools |
#1033 rebased on 4.16