CORENET-6203: Enable test for LGW L2

[arkadeepsen]

This PR enables the test for LGW L2 which was previously disabled.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@arkadeepsen: This pull request references CORENET-6203 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

This PR enables the test for LGW L2 which was previously disabled. Increased the timeout from 30m to 45m to account for the newly enabled test.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[arkadeepsen]

/test ?

[openshift-ci]

@arkadeepsen: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test e2e-aws-jenkins

/test e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones

/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips

/test e2e-aws-ovn-image-registry

/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2

/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2

/test e2e-gcp-ovn

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-builds

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-image-ecosystem

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

/test e2e-vsphere-ovn

/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

/test images

/test lint

/test okd-scos-images

/test unit

/test verify

/test verify-deps

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd

/test e2e-aws-csi

/test e2e-aws-disruptive

/test e2e-aws-etcd-certrotation

/test e2e-aws-etcd-recovery

/test e2e-aws-ovn

/test e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2

/test e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling

/test e2e-aws-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout

/test e2e-aws-ovn-kubevirt

/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift

/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial

/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-ipsec

/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-publicnet-1of2

/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-publicnet-2of2

/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node

/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial

/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview

/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview-serial

/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade

/test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

/test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback

/test e2e-aws-ovn-upi

/test e2e-aws-proxy

/test e2e-azure

/test e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling

/test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade

/test e2e-baremetalds-kubevirt

/test e2e-external-aws

/test e2e-external-aws-ccm

/test e2e-external-vsphere-ccm

/test e2e-gcp-csi

/test e2e-gcp-disruptive

/test e2e-gcp-fips-serial-1of2

/test e2e-gcp-fips-serial-2of2

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial-1of2

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial-2of2

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-usernamespace

/test e2e-hypershift-conformance

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-bgp-virt-dualstack

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-bgp-virt-dualstack-techpreview

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout

/test e2e-metal-ipi-serial-1of2

/test e2e-metal-ipi-serial-2of2

/test e2e-metal-ipi-serial-ovn-ipv6-1of2

/test e2e-metal-ipi-serial-ovn-ipv6-2of2

/test e2e-metal-ipi-virtualmedia

/test e2e-metal-ovn-single-node-live-iso

/test e2e-metal-ovn-single-node-with-worker-live-iso

/test e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-arbiter

/test e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-fencing

/test e2e-openstack-ovn

/test e2e-openstack-serial

/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6

/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling

/test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-csi

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-disruptive

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-fips

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-microshift

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-proxy

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-azure

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-csi

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-disruptive

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-fips-serial-1of2

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-fips-serial-2of2

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial-1of2

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial-2of2

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-hypershift-conformance

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-serial-1of2

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-serial-2of2

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-serial-ovn-ipv6-1of2

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-serial-ovn-ipv6-2of2

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-virtualmedia

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-openstack-ovn

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-openstack-serial

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-vsphere-ovn

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-images

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-lint

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-okd-scos-images

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-unit

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-verify

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-verify-deps

In response to this:

/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[arkadeepsen]

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw

[jcaamano]

This PR enables the test for LGW L2 which was previously disabled. Increased the timeout from 30m to 45m to account for the newly enabled test.

@arkadeepsen before merging this, we need to submit a change in some other repo to keep history after the test name change, as the timeout is part of the test name.

[arkadeepsen]

This PR enables the test for LGW L2 which was previously disabled. Increased the timeout from 30m to 45m to account for the newly enabled test.

@arkadeepsen before merging this, we need to submit a change in some other repo to keep history after the test name change, as the timeout is part of the test name.

@jcaamano I've already created it here openshift-eng/ci-test-mapping#370

[jcaamano]

@arkadeepsen also we need this merged for the tests here to be able to pass
openshift/ovn-kubernetes#2676

[arkadeepsen]

@arkadeepsen also we need this merged for the tests here to be able to pass openshift/ovn-kubernetes#2676

@jcaamano Ack. However, I think there is some issue with the sniffer daemonsets. The test is trying to deploy it twice without removing it. Either we should remove it and then deploy it again, OR, we should deploy it only once.

[jcaamano]

/lgtm
/approve

/hold
for that downstream merge to happen, bgp test pass here and for the test rename to merge

/cc @kyrtapz
can help with unforeseen L2 LGW BGP issues

[jcaamano]

@arkadeepsen when the time comes you can unhold and ask for approval in #forum-ocp-release-oversight

[jcaamano]

@arkadeepsen also we need this merged for the tests here to be able to pass openshift/ovn-kubernetes#2676

@jcaamano Ack. However, I think there is some issue with the sniffer daemonsets. The test is trying to deploy it twice without removing it. Either we should remove it and then deploy it again, OR, we should deploy it only once.

The VRF-Lite test case you mean?

[jcaamano]

@arkadeepsen also we need this merged for the tests here to be able to pass openshift/ovn-kubernetes#2676

@jcaamano Ack. However, I think there is some issue with the sniffer daemonsets. The test is trying to deploy it twice without removing it. Either we should remove it and then deploy it again, OR, we should deploy it only once.

The VRF-Lite test case you mean?

Yeah, for the VRF-Lite test case I think you are right. I thought I did a better job there 🤦

So as we call beforeEach we should also call afterEach.
Additionally, we would need to delete snifferNamespace.
Potentially, also delete either things within targetNamespace, or delete that namespace itself and replace it with another one tricking the e2e framework.

[jcaamano]

/lgtm cancel

due to #30009 (comment)

[arkadeepsen]

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw

[arkadeepsen]

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw

[arkadeepsen]

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw

[openshift-trt]

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 77da08d

Job Name	Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-disruptive	IncompleteTests Tests for this run (106) are below the historical average (311): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling	Medium [sig-architecture] platform pods in ns/openshift-etcd should not exit an excessive amount of times Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis Open Bugs etcd platform pod exist test failing on etcd-scaling jobs
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling	Medium [bz-etcd][invariant] alert/etcdMembersDown should not be at or above info Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis Open Bugs etcd-scaling jobs failing ~60% of the time --- [bz-openshift-apiserver] clusteroperator/openshift-apiserver should not change condition/Available This test has passed 97.28% of 4160 runs on release 4.20 [Overall] in the last week.

Risk analysis has seen new tests most likely introduced by this PR.
Please ensure that new tests meet guidelines for naming and stability.

New Test Risks for sha: 77da08d

Job Name

New Test Risk

pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw

High - "[sig-network][OCPFeatureGate:RouteAdvertisements][Feature:RouteAdvertisements][apigroup:operator.openshift.io] when using openshift ovn-kubernetes [PodNetwork] Advertising a cluster user defined network [apigroup:user.openshift.io][apigroup:security.openshift.io] Over a VRF-Lite configuration Pods should be able to communicate on a secondary network [Timeout:45m] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]" is a new test, was only seen in one job, and failed 1 time(s) against the current commit.

New tests seen in this PR at sha: 77da08d

• "[sig-network][OCPFeatureGate:RouteAdvertisements][Feature:RouteAdvertisements][apigroup:operator.openshift.io] when using openshift ovn-kubernetes [PodNetwork] Advertising a cluster user defined network [apigroup:user.openshift.io][apigroup:security.openshift.io] Over a VRF-Lite configuration Pods should be able to communicate on a secondary network [Timeout:45m] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]" [Total: 1, Pass: 0, Fail: 1, Flake: 0]

[openshift-trt]

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 9964adf

Job Name	Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-disruptive	Medium Job run should complete before timeout This test has passed 92.86% of 14 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:hidden Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:aws Procedure:none SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:micro-downgrade] in the last week.

[jcaamano]

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp

[openshift-trt]

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 9964adf

Job Name	Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-disruptive	Medium Job run should complete before timeout This test has passed 93.33% of 15 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:hidden Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:aws Procedure:none SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:micro-downgrade] in the last week.

[openshift-trt]

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 9964adf

Job Name	Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-disruptive	Medium Job run should complete before timeout This test has passed 92.86% of 14 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:hidden Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:aws Procedure:none SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:micro-downgrade] in the last week.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw	High [sig-network][OCPFeatureGate:RouteAdvertisements][Feature:RouteAdvertisements][apigroup:operator.openshift.io] when using openshift ovn-kubernetes [PodNetwork] Advertising a cluster user defined network [apigroup:user.openshift.io][apigroup:security.openshift.io] Over a VRF-Lite configuration Pods should be able to communicate on a secondary network [Timeout:30m] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] This test has passed 100.00% of 6 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:hidden Network:ovn NetworkStack:dual Owner:eng Platform:metal Procedure:none SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.

[arkadeepsen]

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway

[arkadeepsen]

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw

[openshift-trt]

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 9964adf

Job Name	Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-disruptive	Medium Job run should complete before timeout This test has passed 92.31% of 13 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:hidden Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:aws Procedure:none SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:micro-downgrade] in the last week.

[openshift-trt]

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 9964adf

Job Name	Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-disruptive	Medium Job run should complete before timeout This test has passed 92.31% of 13 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:hidden Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:aws Procedure:none SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:micro-downgrade] in the last week.

[arkadeepsen]

/retest

[openshift-ci-robot]

@arkadeepsen: This pull request references CORENET-6203 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

This PR enables the test for LGW L2 which was previously disabled.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[kyrtapz]

/lgtm

[jcaamano]

/approve
/hold cancel

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: arkadeepsen, jcaamano, kyrtapz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• test/extended/networking/OWNERS [jcaamano]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci-robot]

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b63b144 and 2 for PR HEAD 9964adf in total

[arkadeepsen]

/cherry-pick release-4.19

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@arkadeepsen: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.19 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[arkadeepsen]

/retest-required

[openshift-trt]

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 9964adf

Job Name	Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling	Low [bz-kube-storage-version-migrator] clusteroperator/kube-storage-version-migrator should not change condition/Available This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:aws Procedure:etcd-scaling SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week. --- [bz-Cloud Compute] clusteroperator/control-plane-machine-set should not change condition/Degraded This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:aws Procedure:etcd-scaling SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling	Low [bz-kube-storage-version-migrator] clusteroperator/kube-storage-version-migrator should not change condition/Available This test has passed 71.21% of 3953 runs on release 4.20 [Overall] in the last week. --- [bz-Cloud Compute] clusteroperator/control-plane-machine-set should not change condition/Degraded This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:azure Procedure:etcd-scaling SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.

[openshift-ci]

@arkadeepsen: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-serial	9964adf	link	false	/test e2e-openstack-serial
ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive	9964adf	link	false	/test e2e-aws-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-fips-serial-2of2	9964adf	link	false	/test e2e-gcp-fips-serial-2of2
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-disruptive	9964adf	link	false	/test e2e-gcp-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling	9964adf	link	false	/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling	9964adf	link	false	/test e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6	9964adf	link	false	/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling	9964adf	link	false	/test e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn	9964adf	link	false	/test e2e-openstack-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial	9964adf	link	false	/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling	9964adf	link	false	/test e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade	9964adf	link	false	/test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-fips-serial-1of2	9964adf	link	false	/test e2e-gcp-fips-serial-1of2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade	9964adf	link	false	/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[arkadeepsen]

/retest-required

[openshift-trt]

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 9964adf

Job Name	Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling	Low [bz-kube-storage-version-migrator] clusteroperator/kube-storage-version-migrator should not change condition/Available This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:aws Procedure:etcd-scaling SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week. --- [bz-Cloud Compute] clusteroperator/control-plane-machine-set should not change condition/Degraded This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:aws Procedure:etcd-scaling SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling	Low [bz-kube-storage-version-migrator] clusteroperator/kube-storage-version-migrator should not change condition/Available This test has passed 71.47% of 3926 runs on release 4.20 [Overall] in the last week. --- [bz-Cloud Compute] clusteroperator/control-plane-machine-set should not change condition/Degraded This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:azure Procedure:etcd-scaling SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@arkadeepsen: new pull request created: #30052

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[openshift-bot]

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: openshift-enterprise-tests
This PR has been included in build openshift-enterprise-tests-container-v4.20.0-202508042147.p0.g47c179d.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.