Skip to content

Conversation

@dgoodwin
Copy link
Contributor

We believe this is fixed via https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-57215

Removing this exception will help us see if the problem is full eliminated in CI not just after upgrade, but also anywhere during.

We believe this is fixed via https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-57215

Removing this exception will help us see if the problem is full eliminated in CI not just *after* upgrade, but also anywhere during.
@dgoodwin dgoodwin changed the title Remove exception for monitoring operator going degraded during upgrade OCPBUGS-39026: Remove exception for monitoring operator going degraded during upgrade Jul 23, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 23, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@dgoodwin: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39026, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

We believe this is fixed via https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-57215

Removing this exception will help us see if the problem is full eliminated in CI not just after upgrade, but also anywhere during.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and sjenning July 23, 2025 16:46
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 23, 2025
@dgoodwin
Copy link
Contributor Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.20-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-fips
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.20-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.20-upgrade-from-stable-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.20-upgrade-from-stable-4.19-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 23, 2025

@dgoodwin: trigger 4 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.20-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-fips
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.20-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.20-upgrade-from-stable-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.20-upgrade-from-stable-4.19-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/61be4090-67e7-11f0-891a-1fe0430c43aa-0

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/retest-required

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 28, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 28, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dgoodwin, stbenjam

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@dgoodwin
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

Until openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator#2629 is backported, for multi-upgrade jobs

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 29, 2025
@dgoodwin
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@wking this is now merged as far back as 4.18 and on it's way to 4.16. Good to go I assume? Re-hold if not!

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 31, 2025
@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Sep 15, 2025

/Jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@wking: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39026, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/Jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 3, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 18, 2025

@dgoodwin: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling 1910ae0 link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-fips-serial-2of2 1910ae0 link false /test e2e-gcp-fips-serial-2of2
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn 1910ae0 link false /test e2e-openstack-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling 1910ae0 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling 1910ae0 link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6 1910ae0 link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-serial 1910ae0 link false /test e2e-openstack-serial
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial-2of2 1910ae0 link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial-2of2
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade 1910ae0 link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling 1910ae0 link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2 1910ae0 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-fips-serial-1of2 1910ae0 link false /test e2e-gcp-fips-serial-1of2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node 1910ae0 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node
ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive 1910ae0 link false /test e2e-aws-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway 1910ae0 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-disruptive 1910ae0 link false /test e2e-gcp-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn 1910ae0 link true /test e2e-vsphere-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-csi 1910ae0 link true /test e2e-gcp-csi
ci/prow/e2e-aws-csi 1910ae0 link true /test e2e-aws-csi
ci/prow/go-verify-deps 1910ae0 link true /test go-verify-deps
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift 1910ae0 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial 1910ae0 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 1910ae0 link true /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants