-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
OTA-1643: Each CO must go Progressing during upgrade #30333
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This is to cover the node rebooting case from the rule [1] that is introduced recently: ``` Operators should not report Progressing only because DaemonSets owned by them are adjusting to a new node from cluster scaleup or a node rebooting from cluster upgrade. ``` The test fails if - `co/machine-config` never became Progressing=True during a cluster upgrade, or - some CO left Progressing=False during the upgrade after `machine-config` became Progressing=True. This should not have taken place as `machine-config` was rebooting the nodes which was the only thing ongoing to the cluster during that time. [1]. https://github.com/openshift/api/blob/61248d910ff74aef020492922d14e6dadaba598b/config/v1/types_cluster_operator.go#L163-L164
@hongkailiu: This pull request references OTA-1643 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hongkailiu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Risk analysis has seen new tests most likely introduced by this PR. New Test Risks for sha: b188bf9
New tests seen in this PR at sha: b188bf9
|
@hongkailiu: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/hold
need to rebase after #30296 gets in