Skip to content

Conversation

@deleonio
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +34 to +35
- name: Build Artifacts
uses: ./.github/actions/build-artifacts

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Supply required PAT to build artifacts

The new publish workflow calls the composite action ./.github/actions/build-artifacts without providing its required PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN input. That action’s definition marks the token as required, so this job will fail immediately with “Input required and not supplied: PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN” before any build or publish steps run, blocking the release/3 publish pipeline.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines 3 to +6
on:
push:
branches:
- main
- release/v3

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Update workflow targets nonexistent release/v3 branch

The update workflow now listens for pushes on release/v3, but the rest of the release automation (auto-dependency matrix and the new publish workflow trigger) consistently use the release/3 branch naming. With this typo the update job will never run on the actual release branch, so pushing release/3 changes will no longer deploy the docs unless triggered manually.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@github-actions
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants