-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
Use match statement in checkers (2) #10528
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+837
−802
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6373074
Use match statement in checkers (2)
cdce8p dd1dea3
Add test case for skipped multi-assignments [unnecessary-lambda-assig…
cdce8p 18cc751
Fix regression in unnecessary-lambda-assignment check
cdce8p 933a16c
Raise AssertionError for uncovered fallback case
cdce8p c738ed9
Cleanup
cdce8p dc923b7
Code review
cdce8p b1f867e
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into match-explore-2
cdce8p File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We're missing the case where
isinstance(inferred, util.UninferableBase)
that was previously handled ?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While reviewing the checker code base I've seen the not inferred check in two different ways.
Those could be translated to
The later works since
bool(util.UninferableBase())
also evaluates toFalse
.https://github.com/pylint-dev/astroid/blob/v4.0.0b2/astroid/util.py#L42-L43
--
I decided it might be better to just use one of the styles going forward. My slight preference would be towards
case _ if not inferred
.