Skip to content

Mention GraalPy in the list of other interpreters #1618

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 25, 2025

Conversation

aisk
Copy link
Member

@aisk aisk commented Jul 23, 2025

@@ -217,14 +217,16 @@ CPython, they always have more things they would like to do than they have
developers to work on them. Some major examples that may be of interest are:

* PyPy_: A Python interpreter focused on high speed (JIT-compiled) operation
on major platforms
on major platforms.
* Jython_: A Python interpreter focused on good integration with the Java
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Jython only supports version 2.7 of the language. Perhaps we should preferentially list GraalPy? cc @jeff5 @timfel

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree. GraalPy can be used in a standard JVM (such as OpenJDK), so it's a better choice, as it's the only way to use Python 3 in the Java ecosystem.

@AA-Turner AA-Turner changed the title gh-1606: Mention GraalPy in other implementaion section Mention GraalPy in other implementaion section Jul 23, 2025
@AA-Turner AA-Turner changed the title Mention GraalPy in other implementaion section Mention GraalPy in the list of other interpreters Jul 23, 2025
Co-authored-by: Stan Ulbrych <[email protected]>
@AA-Turner AA-Turner merged commit 7120882 into python:main Jul 25, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants