Add content-filtered-topic interfaces (backport #1506)

[mergify]

Description

Add ContentFilteredTopic interface

Fixes #1504

Is this user-facing behavior change?

No

Did you use Generative AI?

No

---

This is an automatic backport of pull request #1506 done by Mergify.

[mergify]

Cherry-pick of 8d42eaa has failed:

On branch mergify/bp/jazzy/pr-1506
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/jazzy'.

You are currently cherry-picking commit 8d42eaa.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Changes to be committed:
	new file:   rclpy/rclpy/subscription_content_filter_options.py

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add/rm <file>..." as appropriate to mark resolution)
	deleted by us:   rclpy/rclpy/impl/_rclpy_pybind11.pyi
	both modified:   rclpy/rclpy/node.py
	both modified:   rclpy/rclpy/subscription.py
	both modified:   rclpy/src/rclpy/subscription.cpp
	both modified:   rclpy/src/rclpy/subscription.hpp
	both modified:   rclpy/test/test_subscription.py

To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally

[Barry-Xu-2018]

I will handle build issue.

[fujitatomoya]

Pulls: #1521
Gist: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/fujitatomoya/6bdb45a035b6790f2e3a29777b3d09ec/raw/be17410bada7a60ddcc34189ef53e66d0c50142b/ros2.repos
BUILD args: --packages-above-and-dependencies rclpy
TEST args: --packages-above rclpy
ROS Distro: jazzy
Job: ci_launcher
ci_launcher ran: https://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_launcher/17278

• Linux
• Linux-aarch64
• Linux-rhel
• Windows

[fujitatomoya]

@Barry-Xu-2018 can you check https://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_windows/25713/ are unrelated warnings to this PR just in case. (i believe those are not related.)

[Barry-Xu-2018]

@fujitatomoya

can you check https://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_windows/25713/ are unrelated warnings to this PR just in case. (i believe those are not related.)

Yes. The failed tests are unrelated to this PR.
Besides, I try to rerun Windows CI

• Windows

[fujitatomoya]

@Barry-Xu-2018 i am not inclined to take this backport... what do you think?

[fujitatomoya]

this whole file is added in this PR, but originally this is not the content filtering API enhancement. I am not really comfortable with adding this entire file because of this backport.

1. probably it would be better to discuss on adding this pybind11 file aside from cft backport.
2. then we can come back on this PR to backport cft feature.

i think that would be the right procedure to have the consensus with PMC? what do you think?

[christophebedard]

This .pyi file is just for stubs/type information for the Python bindings (e.g., for static type checking). I would just delete this file and keep the rest.