Skip to content

Remove deprecated API usages (Part 2) #2957

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

brfrn169
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

This PR removes deprecated API usages. The changes were primarily made using Claude Code.

Related issues and/or PRs

Changes made

  • Removed deprecated operation constructors usages.

Checklist

The following is a best-effort checklist. If any items in this checklist are not applicable to this PR or are dependent on other, unmerged PRs, please still mark the checkboxes after you have read and understood each item.

  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes.
  • I have considered whether similar issues could occur in other products, components, or modules if this PR is for bug fixes.
  • Any remaining open issues linked to this PR are documented and up-to-date (Jira, GitHub, etc.).
  • Tests (unit, integration, etc.) have been added for the changes.
  • My changes generate no new warnings.
  • Any dependent changes in other PRs have been merged and published.

Additional notes (optional)

N/A

Release notes

N/A

@brfrn169 brfrn169 requested a review from Copilot August 19, 2025 08:47
@brfrn169 brfrn169 self-assigned this Aug 19, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR removes deprecated API usage by migrating from deprecated constructor-based patterns to builder patterns for ScalarDB operations. This includes removing deprecated methods like withValue(), withProjection(), forNamespace() etc., and updating to use Put.newBuilder(), Get.newBuilder(), Scan.newBuilder(), and Delete.newBuilder().

Key changes include:

  • Replacing deprecated operation constructors with builder patterns
  • Removing deprecated method calls like withValue(), forNamespace(), forTable()
  • Updating from ScanAll to Scan with .all() builder method

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 61 out of 61 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
TwoPhaseConsensusCommitSpecificIntegrationTestBase.java Updated test methods to use builder patterns for Put/Get/Scan/Delete operations
ConsensusCommitSpecificIntegrationTestBase.java Migrated operation constructors to builder patterns in integration tests
ConsensusCommitNullMetadataIntegrationTestBase.java Updated ScanAll usage to Scan with builder pattern
TwoPhaseCommitTransactionIntegrationTestBase.java Replaced deprecated constructors with builder patterns in transaction tests
DistributedTransactionIntegrationTestBase.java Updated operation creation to use builder patterns instead of deprecated constructors
DistributedTransactionCrossPartitionScanIntegrationTestBase.java Migrated projection method to use builder pattern
DistributedTransactionAdminIntegrationTestBase.java Updated Put operation to use builder pattern with proper value setters
DistributedStorageIntegrationTestBase.java Migrated storage operations to builder patterns
DistributedStorageConditionalMutationIntegrationTestBase.java Updated conditional mutation operations to use builder patterns
DistributedStorageAdminIntegrationTestBase.java Migrated admin operations to builder patterns
JdbcTransactionManagerTest.java Updated test operations to use builder patterns
TwoPhaseConsensusCommitTest.java Migrated test helper methods to builder patterns
TransactionTableMetadataManagerTest.java Updated Get operations to use builder patterns
SnapshotTest.java Migrated snapshot test operations to builder patterns
SnapshotKeyTest.java Updated test operations to use builder patterns
RollbackMutationComposerTest.java Migrated composer test operations to builder patterns
PrepareMutationComposerTest.java Updated mutation composer operations to builder patterns

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @brfrn169, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on modernizing the API by replacing deprecated operation constructors with a builder pattern. This change affects how Put, Get, Scan, and Delete operations are instantiated throughout the codebase, leading to more consistent and readable code. The refactoring extends to various storage and transaction modules, ensuring that the system leverages the benefits of immutable operation objects. The comprehensive updates across both core logic and test suites underscore a commitment to maintaining high code quality and API usability.

Highlights

  • API Modernization: The primary change in this pull request is the migration from direct constructor usage for Put, Get, Scan, and Delete operations to a more modern and flexible builder pattern. This enhances API consistency and code readability.
  • Deprecation Removal: Deprecated constructors for Mutation operations have been removed, ensuring that new code adheres to the updated builder-based API.
  • Code Refactoring: Utility methods and core logic across various storage and transaction modules have been refactored to seamlessly integrate with the new builder pattern, promoting immutability and cleaner code.
  • Test Suite Updates: All relevant integration and unit tests have been updated to reflect the API changes, ensuring continued correctness and stability of the codebase.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request is a large-scale refactoring to remove deprecated API usages, primarily replacing old-style operation constructors with the builder pattern. The changes are extensive and touch many files, including core logic and tests. The new code is more readable and promotes immutability, which is a significant improvement in code quality. The changes appear to be correct and consistent with the PR's goal. I've identified a couple of areas for potential improvement regarding code duplication and conciseness.

@brfrn169
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/gemini review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request is a large but valuable refactoring effort to remove deprecated API usages, specifically replacing operation constructors with the builder pattern. The changes are widespread across the codebase, including core logic and numerous test files, and appear to be correctly implemented. This move towards builders is a positive step for maintainability and API clarity. I particularly appreciate the improvements towards immutability in classes like CrudHandler and ScalarDbUtils, where methods that previously mutated their arguments now create new objects. The test updates are also consistent with these changes. Overall, this is a solid and well-executed refactoring.

Copy link
Contributor

@Torch3333 Torch3333 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you!

Copy link
Contributor

@komamitsu komamitsu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants