Skip to content

Conversation

jorenham
Copy link
Contributor

@jorenham jorenham commented Jul 2, 2025

@jorenham jorenham force-pushed the sync-spec7-with-scipy branch from 02bd475 to 129a4d1 Compare July 2, 2025 16:38
@jorenham
Copy link
Contributor Author

jorenham commented Jul 2, 2025

CI failure seems unrelated: /bin/bash: line 1: yaml2ics: command not found

@bsipocz
Copy link
Member

bsipocz commented Jul 2, 2025

yeap, ignore the CI for now (and it doesn't matter here anyway as the code is not run in the page just included verbatim)

Copy link
Member

@bsipocz bsipocz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code itself looks reasonable, but this made me open #399 to question if we should have this code in the SPEC doc to begin with.

(and as the discussion in the scipy thread shows, it's not obvious if the preference is to keep or drop the keywords from the signature.)

Copy link
Member

@bsipocz bsipocz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, let's have this in and we address the question of moving codes outside of SPEC docs separately.

Thanks!

@bsipocz bsipocz merged commit c37bbc4 into scientific-python:main Aug 5, 2025
2 checks passed
@jorenham jorenham deleted the sync-spec7-with-scipy branch August 5, 2025 21:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants