Skip to content

Conversation

@sparkymat
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@kirillrdy
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry it took me that long to have a look at this.
Basically this looks very good and useful, the only think i would rename package to something else.
perhaps "form" mainly i was thinking of it becoming more or less equivalent of formtastic or simple_form.

That being said the name is still open for discussion

K

@sparkymat
Copy link
Owner Author

I agree. Need a better name. I agree, something more like simple_form or formtastic.

goform? :)

@kirillrdy
Copy link
Collaborator

since package is nested under websl form sounds like a good name unless you want it to be seperate propject

@sparkymat
Copy link
Owner Author

formalize right? . i'd prefer keeping it in webdsl for now

On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:55 AM kirillrdy [email protected] wrote:

since package is nested under websl form sounds like a good name unless
you want it to be seperate propject


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#4 (comment).

@kirillrdy
Copy link
Collaborator

sure, why not

On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:13 AM sparkymat [email protected] wrote:

formalize right? . i'd prefer keeping it in webdsl for now

On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:55 AM kirillrdy [email protected] wrote:

since package is nested under websl form sounds like a good name unless
you want it to be seperate propject

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#4 (comment).

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#4 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants