This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 12, 2018. It is now read-only.
Generate coverage stats using slather/Coveralls #107
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Modify project file to generate test coverage files Install slather and run slather on success Use travis plugin in Podfile Add slather.yml to send test coverage stats to coveralls
- Update .travis.yml to use built-in and use runner instead of Makefile - Use activesupport so that slather successfully reads coverage reports on Travis and sends them to Coveralls
|
Looks like Travis is being flaky again. I re-ran Travis on the same branch in my fork and it passed. I would enable coveralls on this repo and then re-run Travis on the last build |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Coveralls Test Coverage needs to be enabled for supermarin/ObjectiveSugar. It's already enabled for dasmer/ObjectiveSugar, and shows a coverage of ~95.97%.
Also: Ignore #104 #105 #106 Those were intended to be test PR's to my fork's master instead.