[concurrency] Fix optimize_hop_to_executor so that we take advantage of the new nonisolated(nonsending) ABI in post 6.2. #83295
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@swift-ci smoke test |
|
@swift-ci smoke test |
…of the new nonisolated(nonsending) ABI in post 6.2. Specifically: 1. We assume in nonisolated(nonsending) that we are already on the relevant actor. This lets us always eliminate the initial hop_to_executor. 2. We stopped treating nonisolated(nonsending) functions as suspension points since we are guaranteed to always be on the same actor when we enter/return. 3. Now that nonisolated(nonsending) is no longer a suspension point, I could sink the needs executor nonisolated(nonsending) specific code into the needs executor code. For those unfamiliar it is that we: a. treat a nonisolated(nonsending) callee as a needs executor since we are no longer guaranteed to hop in callees and b. treat returns from nonisolated(nonsending) functions as being a needs executor instruction since we are no longer guaranteed to hop in the caller after such a function returns. rdar://155465878
gottesmm
force-pushed
the
pr-0b35d691a2ceae00c6e9727dd57aeedb631d207c
branch
from
b2cf160 to
734f057
Compare
|
@swift-ci smoke test |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Specifically:
We assume in nonisolated(nonsending) that we are already on the relevant actor. This lets us always eliminate the initial hop_to_executor.
We stopped treating nonisolated(nonsending) functions as suspension points since we are guaranteed to always be on the same actor when we enter/return.
Now that nonisolated(nonsending) is no longer a suspension point, I could sink the needs executor nonisolated(nonsending) specific code into the needs executor code. For those unfamiliar it is that we: a. treat a nonisolated(nonsending) callee as a needs executor since we are no longer guaranteed to hop in callees and b. treat returns from nonisolated(nonsending) functions as being a needs executor instruction since we are no longer guaranteed to hop in the caller after such a function returns.
rdar://155465878
NOTE: I just had this locally already done, so I am uploading it now to main.