-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
ci: turn on linters #1185
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci: turn on linters #1185
Conversation
2b4a206
to
59e26ec
Compare
58058fc
to
45cce06
Compare
59e26ec
to
e155128
Compare
45cce06
to
9a85455
Compare
e155128
to
b4547b7
Compare
9a85455
to
0beb8b5
Compare
b4547b7
to
20a96d7
Compare
0beb8b5
to
ca78a15
Compare
20a96d7
to
707afff
Compare
ca78a15
to
8657ea5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, but I don't catch the point of splitting into 2 PRs. The first one (#1184) turns off the job and the second one (this PR) turns it back. I would understand if this job fails in #1184 and then I would expect that it is fixed with this PR and turned back, but I see no fix, it just turned back. Would you please clarify? Why don't we just keep this job intact in #1184 and drop this PR?
25a4d6e
to
89506dd
Compare
8657ea5
to
c1fa1f1
Compare
Please check comment: #1184 (comment) |
Got it, thanks! |
89506dd
to
da4751e
Compare
c1fa1f1
to
40b47f9
Compare
da4751e
to
0e01c6d
Compare
40b47f9
to
8ff567b
Compare
8ff567b
to
55ecb7c
Compare
0e01c6d
to
400e4db
Compare
55ecb7c
to
caddb4b
Compare
Part of #TNTP-3105
caddb4b
to
d2cdc88
Compare
Turn on static code analyzes.
Second part for #1184
Part of #TNTP-3105