Skip to content

Conversation

maximiliankolb
Copy link
Contributor

What changes are you introducing?

  • Drop unnecessary prerequisite about OS platform
  • Drop note about Katello plugin for Hammer CLI which should be installed on Foreman/Katello Server anyway
  • Fix anchor

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

I stumbled over the wording as part of #3672 & the limitation to EL8/9 caught my eye which must be bogus because Foreman+Katello nightly only runs on EL9.

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

Untested anything else than enabling the feature.

Contributor checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.16/Katello 4.18 (Satellite 6.18)
  • Foreman 3.15/Katello 4.17
  • Foreman 3.14/Katello 4.16 (Satellite 6.17; orcharhino 7.4)
  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15 (EL9 only)
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16; orcharhino 7.2 on EL9 only; orcharhino 7.3)
  • Foreman 3.11/Katello 4.13 (orcharhino 6.11 on EL8 only; orcharhino 7.0 on EL8+EL9; orcharhino 7.1 with Leapp)
  • Foreman 3.10/Katello 4.12
  • Foreman 3.9/Katello 4.11 (Satellite 6.15; orcharhino 6.8/6.9/6.10)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.9.

* Drop unnecessary prerequisite about OS platform
* Drop note about Katello plugin for Hammer CLI which should be
  installed on Foreman/Katello Server anyway
* Fix anchor
@github-actions github-actions bot added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing labels Sep 26, 2025
Copy link

@aneta-petrova aneta-petrova added style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective and removed Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective labels Oct 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants