Document expand() output with unrealized factor levels
#292
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
eutwt
changed the title
expand() output with unrealized factorsexpand() output with unrealized factor levels
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As requested in #290. I'm not too familiar with tidyverse documentation standards so it would be understandable if you'd rather change it yourself.
See #250 for ideas on how to support unrealized factor levels in dtplyr.
Until then, this PR is adding documentation to explain the difference from the data.frame method (and removing the previous incorrect documentation). Not sure if the example showcasing the difference is needed.