use 'HTTP_FLY_FORWARDED_PROTO' to determine scheme. #107
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I am using https://glitch.com/ and unfortunately even the
HTTP_X_FORWARDED_PROTOishttps,https,httpswhen fetching http files. however theHTTP_FLY_FORWARDED_PROTOis accurate and comes through as a simplehttporhttps. I am using this fork on my site right now, withgem 'rack-ssl-enforcer', github: 'jubishop/rack-ssl-enforcer'but would be happy to push this back into the main branch.For nearly all users this should have no impact, because this header won't exist. But in the rare cases where it does, it solves this bug.