feat: produce a standalone jar without dependencies (refs #98) #103
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closed
tomasbjerre
force-pushed
the
feature/issue-98-standalone
branch
2 times, most recently
from
40c8e1c to
589064d
Compare
tomasbjerre
force-pushed
the
feature/issue-98-standalone
branch
from
589064d to
1dce893
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Providing an alternative with minimal transitives may often solve issues like #98.
The shadow feature in the gradle extension is disabled here with a property to avoid getting the wiremock-dependency from:
https://github.com/wiremock/gradle-wiremock-extension-plugins/blob/a7a891e2465bd5fe6bd3532cc0ba226016bbd64a/src/main/groovy/org.wiremock.tools.gradle.wiremock-extension-convention.gradle#L242
This change will give a nice standalone alternative,
wiremock-spring-boot-standalone, and keepwiremock-spring-boot.I think it will work once #102 is merged, where Spring Boot is no longer a transitive.
References