Skip to content

fix(verbose): correct connection verbose tracing#1055

Merged
0x676e67 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix
Jan 14, 2026
Merged

fix(verbose): correct connection verbose tracing#1055
0x676e67 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix

Conversation

@0x676e67
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@0x676e67 0x676e67 added the c-bug Category: bug. Something is wrong. This is bad! label Jan 14, 2026
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @0x676e67, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the verbose tracing mechanism for client connections by applying performance optimizations and correcting an issue in how read buffers were handled. The changes ensure more efficient and accurate tracing of connection activities, particularly for read operations, by streamlining the Connection trait implementation.

Highlights

  • Performance Optimization: Added #[inline] attributes to connected, is_write_vectored, poll_flush, and poll_shutdown methods within the Connection trait implementation for the Wrapper struct. This provides hints to the compiler for potential performance improvements by inlining these frequently called, small methods.
  • Corrected Read Buffer Handling: Removed a redundant and potentially incorrect buf.advance(len) call and associated comments from the poll_read method. The ReadBuf's filled() method correctly reflects the data read, and the underlying poll_read implementation already handles advancing the buffer, making the manual advancement unnecessary.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces #[inline] attributes to several passthrough methods in the Wrapper struct, which is a good optimization for these simple delegation functions. Additionally, it corrects the poll_read implementation by removing a redundant buf.advance(len) call. This change ensures that the ReadBuf is handled correctly by the underlying AsyncRead implementation, preventing potential double-advancement issues and improving the correctness of the verbose tracing wrapper. Overall, these are positive changes that enhance both performance and correctness.

@0x676e67 0x676e67 merged commit 22516ae into main Jan 14, 2026
22 checks passed
@0x676e67 0x676e67 deleted the fix branch January 14, 2026 11:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c-bug Category: bug. Something is wrong. This is bad!

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant