Engelca/1135 1178 1179 improve access ram3 documentation

[engelca]

ACCESS-Hive Docs

Description

Changes were required to the ACCESS-Hive ACCESS-rAM3 (affecting the run-a-model, model landing page and the generic rose/cylc page) to cope with removing OSTIA from the standard example AND for including the revision number in the rose/cylc checkout. The website was simplified by moving sections of text around (within pages and between pages to improve readability as well).

Fixes #1135

Fixes #1178

Please note that it introduces a inconsistency in the rose_cylc.md file that I would like to discuss because:

• the rose commands are longer in rose_cylc.md so they can be run from anywhere
• the commands shifted into rose_cylc.md are written as though they are being executed from within the rose/ directory.
• the text would need to choose one or the other, or explain the difference.
• I wasn't sure what the preference would be.

Still to do:

• switch the USE_OSTIA to .FALSE. in the demonstration suite.
• switch the localhost to localhost instead of gadi.nci.org.au

Type of change

• [X ] New link / content

Checklist:

• [ X ] The new content is accessible and located in the appropriate section
• [ X ] My changes do not break navigation and do not generate new warnings
  - There are some broken links and I am not sure if they are new.
• [ X ] I have checked that the links are valid and point to the intended content
• [ X ] I have checked my code/text and corrected any misspellings

[github-actions]

PR Preview
🚀 Preview of PR head commit efb7306 deployed to https://docs.access-hive.org.au/pr-previews/1181
2026-07-08 03:23 AEST
Preview generated through the Deploy to GitHub Pages workflow run 28885468113.

[paigem]

Thanks so much @engelca for this PR! It looks great - I think this update increases understandability noticeably - so thank you! I just suggest a couple minor wording updates, but otherwise I think this is ready to merge.

With the addition of revision in the rose/cylc page, we will want to ensure we make it clear what users should do for the revision in the docs for other models that use rose/cylc. Not in scope for this PR, but something I have noted and will action when we revamp the rose/cylc page. 😊

[engelca]

Thanks @paigem. I have accepted your two suggestions. Good point about "two" not multiple.

I will update the suite to be have USE_OSTIA = False later this morning.

[paigem]

Just a quick update to say that we will add a couple more edits to this PR before merging.