Fix: Detect illegal ContinueWith usage in orchestrators using AsyncLocal#3303
Draft
Fix: Detect illegal ContinueWith usage in orchestrators using AsyncLocal#3303
Conversation
…in orchestrators The previous implementation relied solely on OrchestrationContext.IsOrchestratorThread which is a [ThreadStatic] variable that doesn't properly flow with async context. This can lead to false negatives when thread pool reuses the same thread. This fix adds an AsyncLocal<DurableOrchestrationContext> that properly flows with async context, enabling reliable detection of illegal async patterns like calling activities from within ContinueWith blocks. Co-authored-by: YunchuWang <12449837+YunchuWang@users.noreply.github.com>
…debug assertion Co-authored-by: YunchuWang <12449837+YunchuWang@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Fix task execution order in ContinueWith block
Fix: Detect illegal ContinueWith usage in orchestrators using AsyncLocal
Jan 5, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
What changed?
AsyncLocal<DurableOrchestrationContext>to track orchestration context across async flowsThrowIfInvalidAccess()to check bothIsOrchestratorThreadand theAsyncLocalcontextTaskOrchestrationShimto set/clear context at orchestration execution boundariesWhy is this change needed?
The existing
OrchestrationContext.IsOrchestratorThreadcheck uses[ThreadStatic]which doesn't flow with async context. When thread pool reuses the same thread forContinueWithcontinuations, the check fails to detect illegal access—causing activities to execute out of order silently.AsyncLocal<T>properly flows with async context, enabling reliable detection of illegal patterns like:Issues / work items
Project checklist
WebJobs.Extensions.DurableTaskpackageEventSourcelogsv2.xbranchAI-assisted code disclosure (required)
Was an AI tool used? (select one)
If AI was used:
DurableOrchestrationContext.cs,TaskOrchestrationShim.csAI verification (required if AI was used):
Testing
Automated tests
Manual validation (only if runtime/behavior changed)
ThrowIfInvalidAccessbehavior preserved; new check is additive)Notes for reviewers
AsyncLocalcheck complements the existingIsOrchestratorThreadcheck—both must passClearCurrentContext()includesDebug.Assertto help catch logic errors during developmentContinueWithwithoutExecuteSynchronously; this adds runtime enforcementWarning
Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses (expand for details)
I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:
azfunc.pkgs.visualstudio.com/opt/hostedtoolcache/CodeQL/2.23.8/x64/codeql/csharp/tools/linux64/Semmle.Autobuild.CSharp /opt/hostedtoolcache/CodeQL/2.23.8/x64/codeql/csharp/tools/linux64/Semmle.Autobuild.CSharp(dns block)If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:
Original prompt
This section details on the original issue you should resolve
<issue_title>Calling activities within a ContinueWith block in durable functions is executing tasks out of order</issue_title>
<issue_description>From @shaunol on June 28, 2018 23:22
Calling activities within a ContinueWith block in durable functions is executing tasks out of order. I put together a minimal repro which outputs the sequence as log warnings.
Repro steps
Provide the steps required to reproduce the problem:
Expected behavior
The output sequence should always be 0,1,2
Actual behavior
The output sequence shows both 0,1,2, and 0,2,1 seemingly randomly. It happens enough that you can run the function manually and see the issue within a few attempts.
Known workarounds
Don't call activities inside ContinueWith blocks
Related information
I included a non-durable example of the same code sequence, which appears to always be in the correct order from manual testing.
Source
Copied from original issue: Azure/azure-functions-host#3075</issue_description>
<agent_instructions>check if this issue still exists, if so fix it</agent_instructions>
Comments on the Issue (you are @copilot in this section)
💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.