Fixes #21 on my machine

[dkoslicki]

But I barely know what I am doing as this is my first time working with Docker compose

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 45.26%. Comparing base (457ec71) to head (4faad35).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
shepherd_utils/config.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8ca1cf2...4faad35. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[maximusunc]

That's awesome that this fixes it! It seems like the issue is that on your local machine inside of your docker, the individual containers aren't able to resolve localhost to their local docker network (I've seen issues like this before and it's a crapshoot and based on computer). I suggest we make this change in one location here: https://github.com/BioPack-team/shepherd/blob/main/shepherd_utils/config.py which is where those urls are defined for all services. And I think using shepherd_db and shepherd_broker is the right approach. Docker will know how to DNS those names and our local development is going to use docker fairly exclusively. One could technically run everything local, but it would require spinning up your own redis, postgres, any other dbs you need, and then run each worker as a separate python process, which is going to be a lot of work.

[dkoslicki]

How's that look? I may have mixed up which was the broker (as they're named in that config redis and postgres)

[maximusunc]

Yep, looks great!