In your Table 1, the reported results are significantly lower than those in the original papers.
For example (MVTec dataset):
UniAD:
Image-Auroc original 96.5 vs yours 87.5
Pixel-Auroc original 96.8 vs yours 94.2
Dinomaly:
Image-Auroc original 99.6 vs yours 98.8
Pixel-Auroc original 98.4 vs yours 97.6
Please clarify.
Thanks.
In your Table 1, the reported results are significantly lower than those in the original papers.
For example (MVTec dataset):
UniAD:
Image-Auroc original 96.5 vs yours 87.5
Pixel-Auroc original 96.8 vs yours 94.2
Dinomaly:
Image-Auroc original 99.6 vs yours 98.8
Pixel-Auroc original 98.4 vs yours 97.6
Please clarify.
Thanks.