Skip to content

Conversation

AlexeyKrasnoperov
Copy link
Member

@AlexeyKrasnoperov AlexeyKrasnoperov commented Jul 18, 2025

filecoin-requests-builder is used to generate method definitions, k6 just goes through them.

Single method and all benchmarks supported.

First of all, a user is required to generate requests definitions, they will be stored to the methods/requests.json file, which then could be manually adjusted if needed and used to reproduce the same scenario on another server

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a script to generate up-to-date JSON-RPC method definitions for benchmarking.
    • Introduced a new test script for benchmarking a single RPC method using dynamic parameters.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Standardized environment variable names for specifying the RPC URL across scripts and documentation.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced README with instructions for generating method definitions and clarified benchmarking steps.
  • Chores

    • Improved .gitignore for Yarn and build artifacts.
    • Updated dependencies and npm scripts for improved workflow.
    • Added new Makefile target for building request definitions.
  • Refactor

    • Simplified test scripts to load method parameters from a JSON file.
    • Updated utility function to accept method names and parameters directly.
    • Added utility to load request definitions with error guidance.
  • Revert

    • Removed obsolete test scripts and static method definitions.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jul 18, 2025

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@AlexeyKrasnoperov AlexeyKrasnoperov marked this pull request as ready for review July 18, 2025 15:32
@AlexeyKrasnoperov AlexeyKrasnoperov requested a review from a team as a code owner July 18, 2025 15:32
@AlexeyKrasnoperov AlexeyKrasnoperov requested review from elmattic, sudo-shashank, LesnyRumcajs, a team and hanabi1224 and removed request for a team, elmattic and sudo-shashank July 18, 2025 15:32
@LesnyRumcajs
Copy link
Member

@coderabbitai full review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 22, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 22, 2025

Walkthrough

This set of changes refactors how JSON-RPC method definitions are managed and used for benchmarking. Static JavaScript method definitions were removed and replaced by a generated JSON file created via a new build script. Test scripts were updated to load method data dynamically from this JSON. Documentation, environment variables, and configuration files were updated accordingly, including renaming environment variables and adding instructions for generating method definitions.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
Gitignore updates
.gitignore
Refined Yarn ignore rules; added methods/requests.json to ignore list.
Makefile changes
Makefile
Renamed environment variable from K6_TEST_URL to K6_RPC_URL in all targets; added new build-requests target.
Documentation updates
README.md
Added "Methods Definitions" section; updated environment variables and benchmarking instructions; improved clarity.
Package configuration
package.json
Added build-requests npm script, "type": "module" field, and new devDependency @chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder.
Request building script
scripts/build_requests.js
New script to generate methods/requests.json by fetching live RPC context and building requests.
Method definitions removal
methods/index.js
Removed static JavaScript RPC method definitions and exports.
Test script updates
tests/all.js
Updated to load methods and parameters from requests.json; renamed environment variable; added error handling.
New single method test
tests/single_method.js
Added new test script to benchmark a single method using parameters from requests.json.
Removed old test scripts
tests/gas_price.js, tests/top5.js
Removed old test scripts that relied on static method definitions.
RPC utility refactor
utils/rpc.js
Refactored sendRpcRequest to accept method name and parameters explicitly instead of a method object.
New utility for loading requests
utils/loadRequests.js
Added function to load and parse methods/requests.json with error handling and instructions if missing.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant build_requests.js
    participant filecoin-requests-builder
    participant methods/requests.json

    User->>build_requests.js: Run build-requests script
    build_requests.js->>filecoin-requests-builder: fetchRpcContext(RPC_URL)
    filecoin-requests-builder-->>build_requests.js: RPC context
    build_requests.js->>filecoin-requests-builder: buildRequests(context)
    filecoin-requests-builder-->>build_requests.js: Requests object
    build_requests.js->>methods/requests.json: Write requests as JSON
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant K6 Test Script
    participant methods/requests.json
    participant RPC Endpoint

    K6 Test Script->>methods/requests.json: Load method definitions
    loop For each method
        K6 Test Script->>RPC Endpoint: Send request (method, params)
        RPC Endpoint-->>K6 Test Script: Response
    end
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes

Poem

A rabbit hopped through JSON trees,
Replacing static lists with keys.
With scripts that build and tests that run,
The codebase shines—its work well done!
Now methods flex with every call,
And bunnies cheer for changes small.
🐇✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch use-requests-builder

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tests/all.js (2)

7-7: Remove unnecessary await for synchronous JSON parsing.

The open() function is synchronous in k6, so await is unnecessary here.

-const requests = await JSON.parse(open('../methods/requests.json'));
+const requests = JSON.parse(open('../methods/requests.json'));

11-12: Add error handling for malformed JSON or missing file.

Consider adding error handling for cases where the JSON file is missing or malformed.

-  for (const [method, { params }] of Object.entries(requests)) {
-    const response = sendRpcRequest(url, method, params);
+  try {
+    for (const [method, { params }] of Object.entries(requests)) {
+      const response = sendRpcRequest(url, method, params);
+      assertSuccess(response);
+    }
+  } catch (error) {
+    console.error('Error processing requests:', error.message);
+    throw error;
+  }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2ed231b and e55ff7d.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • Makefile (1 hunks)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
  • methods/index.js (0 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • scripts/build_requests.js (1 hunks)
  • tests/all.js (1 hunks)
  • tests/gas_price.js (0 hunks)
  • tests/single_method.js (1 hunks)
  • tests/top5.js (0 hunks)
  • utils/rpc.js (2 hunks)
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (4)
tests/all.js (4)
scripts/build_requests.js (2)
  • url (4-4)
  • requests (7-7)
tests/single_method.js (4)
  • url (4-4)
  • requests (8-8)
  • method (5-5)
  • response (16-16)
utils/benchmark_params.js (2)
  • regularBenchmarkParams (2-8)
  • regularBenchmarkParams (2-8)
utils/rpc.js (2)
  • response (16-19)
  • sendRpcRequest (4-26)
scripts/build_requests.js (2)
tests/single_method.js (2)
  • url (4-4)
  • requests (8-8)
tests/all.js (2)
  • url (4-4)
  • requests (7-7)
tests/single_method.js (3)
scripts/build_requests.js (2)
  • url (4-4)
  • requests (7-7)
tests/all.js (5)
  • url (4-4)
  • options (6-6)
  • options (6-6)
  • requests (7-7)
  • response (12-12)
utils/rpc.js (3)
  • response (16-19)
  • sendRpcRequest (4-26)
  • assertSuccess (28-36)
utils/rpc.js (3)
scripts/build_requests.js (1)
  • url (4-4)
tests/single_method.js (3)
  • url (4-4)
  • method (5-5)
  • response (16-16)
tests/all.js (2)
  • url (4-4)
  • response (12-12)
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[style] ~17-~17: Consider using a less common alternative to make your writing sound more unique and professional.
Context: ...em in the methods/requests.json file. Feel free to adjust parameters manually. ## Local b...

(FEEL_FREE_TO_STYLE_ME)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
  • tests/top5.js
  • tests/gas_price.js
  • methods/index.js
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (4)
tests/all.js (4)
scripts/build_requests.js (2)
  • url (4-4)
  • requests (7-7)
tests/single_method.js (4)
  • url (4-4)
  • requests (8-8)
  • method (5-5)
  • response (16-16)
utils/benchmark_params.js (2)
  • regularBenchmarkParams (2-8)
  • regularBenchmarkParams (2-8)
utils/rpc.js (2)
  • response (16-19)
  • sendRpcRequest (4-26)
scripts/build_requests.js (2)
tests/single_method.js (2)
  • url (4-4)
  • requests (8-8)
tests/all.js (2)
  • url (4-4)
  • requests (7-7)
tests/single_method.js (3)
scripts/build_requests.js (2)
  • url (4-4)
  • requests (7-7)
tests/all.js (5)
  • url (4-4)
  • options (6-6)
  • options (6-6)
  • requests (7-7)
  • response (12-12)
utils/rpc.js (3)
  • response (16-19)
  • sendRpcRequest (4-26)
  • assertSuccess (28-36)
utils/rpc.js (3)
scripts/build_requests.js (1)
  • url (4-4)
tests/single_method.js (3)
  • url (4-4)
  • method (5-5)
  • response (16-16)
tests/all.js (2)
  • url (4-4)
  • response (12-12)
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[style] ~17-~17: Consider using a less common alternative to make your writing sound more unique and professional.
Context: ...em in the methods/requests.json file. Feel free to adjust parameters manually. ## Local b...

(FEEL_FREE_TO_STYLE_ME)

🔇 Additional comments (13)
.gitignore (1)

1-11: LGTM! Proper exclusion patterns for Yarn and generated files.

The refined Yarn exclusions follow best practices by preserving necessary Yarn subdirectories while excluding cache and PnP files. Adding methods/requests.json to gitignore is correct since this file is generated by the build script.

package.json (2)

11-11: LGTM! ES module configuration enables import syntax.

Adding "type": "module" correctly enables ES module syntax used in the new build script.


8-8: LGTM! New build script aligns with the refactoring.

The build-requests script properly integrates the new dynamic request generation workflow.

Makefile (1)

2-2: LGTM! Consistent environment variable naming.

Renaming K6_TEST_URL to K6_RPC_URL across all targets improves clarity and aligns with the standardization across the codebase.

Also applies to: 5-5, 8-8, 11-11

tests/all.js (1)

4-4: LGTM! Consistent environment variable usage.

The environment variable change to K6_RPC_URL aligns with the standardization across the codebase.

utils/rpc.js (3)

4-8: LGTM! Clean refactor of function signature.

The change from accepting a method object to separate method and params arguments is a good improvement that:

  • Makes the function signature more intuitive and explicit
  • Aligns well with the new dynamic JSON-based approach for loading method definitions
  • Eliminates the need for method objects with name and params properties

18-18: Tagging correctly updated for new signature.

The HTTP request tagging now uses the method string directly, which is consistent with the updated function signature.


22-22: Debug logging properly updated.

The debug logging now uses the method string directly, maintaining the same debugging functionality with the new signature.

README.md (2)

9-19: Excellent documentation of the new workflow.

The new "Methods Definitions" section clearly explains:

  • How to generate method definitions using the requests builder
  • The purpose and location of the generated methods/requests.json file
  • That users can manually adjust parameters for customization

This provides users with the essential information needed to work with the new dynamic approach.


24-34: Well-executed environment variable standardization.

The updates consistently replace K6_TEST_URL with the more descriptive K6_RPC_URL throughout all examples, and properly document the new K6_METHOD variable for single-method benchmarking. This improves clarity and supports the new flexible testing approach.

Also applies to: 41-41, 50-54

tests/single_method.js (3)

1-2: Proper imports for the test functionality.

The imports correctly bring in the RPC utilities and benchmark parameters needed for the single-method testing.


4-8: Well-structured configuration with appropriate defaults.

The configuration properly:

  • Uses the standardized K6_RPC_URL environment variable
  • Defaults to eth_gasPrice which is ideal for single-method testing
  • Loads the generated methods/requests.json file using the correct async pattern
  • Exports the benchmark options for k6

11-18: Robust implementation of single-method benchmarking.

The test function includes:

  • Proper validation that the requested method exists in the loaded definitions
  • Clear error messaging for unsupported methods
  • Correct usage of the updated sendRpcRequest function with separate method and params arguments
  • Appropriate success assertion

This provides a flexible foundation for benchmarking any supported RPC method.

AlexeyKrasnoperov and others added 3 commits July 24, 2025 15:52
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@@ -0,0 +1,1134 @@
{

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we remove this in favor of yarn.lock

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

yarn.lock Outdated
languageName: node
linkType: hard
# THIS IS AN AUTOGENERATED FILE. DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE DIRECTLY.
# yarn lockfile v1

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about using yarn@v3 instead of classic v1

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm. Not sure how it happened, but I regenerated it with v4.

tests/all.js Outdated

export let options = regularBenchmarkParams;
const requests = JSON.parse(open('../methods/requests.json'));

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Better to print instructions on how to generate requests.json when it does not exist since it's not included by default.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

const method = __ENV.K6_METHOD || "eth_gasPrice";

export let options = regularBenchmarkParams;
const requests = JSON.parse(open('../methods/requests.json'));

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ditto. Better to print instruction

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done


all-forest-local:
k6 run -e K6_TEST_URL=http://localhost:2345/rpc/v1 tests/all.js
k6 run -e K6_RPC_URL=http://localhost:2345/rpc/v1 tests/all.js

all-lotus-local:
Copy link

@hanabi1224 hanabi1224 Jul 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How expensive is build-requests? If it's cheap, should we always depend on it

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It takes around 5-10 seconds, but I'd prefer to run it manually as I don't want params to change frequently and potentially affect the benchmarks results. I plan to reuse requests.json file to benchmark different node implementations with the same params.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
Makefile (2)

2-11: Avoid duplication by extracting common variables
The four K6 targets are almost identical except for the RPC URL and execution mode. Repeating the full command string makes future edits error-prone (e.g., renaming the test file, tweaking flags). Consider introducing variables such as RPC_FOREST_URL, RPC_LOTUS_URL and K6_FLAGS (cloud vs. local), then composing the targets with those.
This keeps the Makefile DRY and reduces the chance of mismatched options across targets.

Example patch outline:

+# --- globals --------------------------------------------------
+RPC_FOREST_URL ?= http://localhost:2345/rpc/v1
+RPC_LOTUS_URL  ?= http://localhost:1234/rpc/v1
+TEST_FILE      ?= tests/all.js
+
+# Helper for local vs. cloud
+define run_k6
+	k6 $(1) -e K6_RPC_URL=$(2) $(TEST_FILE)
+endef
+
 all-forest-cloud:
-	k6 cloud run -e K6_RPC_URL=http://localhost:2345/rpc/v1 --local-execution tests/all.js
+	$(call run_k6,cloud run --local-execution,$(RPC_FOREST_URL))
...

16-16: Missing conventional PHONY meta-targets
Static analysis flags the absence of the customary all, clean, and test phony targets. If your project intentionally omits them, ignore this warning. Otherwise, adding minimal placeholders (even if they only print help) will silence tooling and improve developer ergonomics.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d3abae4 and dc11acb.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Makefile (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: AlexeyKrasnoperov
PR: ChainSafe/filecoin-benchmark-suite#2
File: package.json:19-19
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T14:03:44.246Z
Learning: The npm package chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder exists and is publicly available on the npm registry at https://www.npmjs.com/package/chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder
Learnt from: AlexeyKrasnoperov
PR: ChainSafe/filecoin-benchmark-suite#2
File: package.json:19-19
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T14:03:44.246Z
Learning: The npm package chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder version 0.1.0 exists and is available on the official npm registry at https://registry.npmjs.org/chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder/-/filecoin-requests-builder-0.1.0.tgz
📚 Learning: the npm package @chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder exists and is publicly available on the npm reg...
Learnt from: AlexeyKrasnoperov
PR: ChainSafe/filecoin-benchmark-suite#2
File: package.json:19-19
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T14:03:44.246Z
Learning: The npm package chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder exists and is publicly available on the npm registry at https://www.npmjs.com/package/chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder

Applied to files:

  • Makefile
📚 Learning: the npm package @chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder version 0.1.0 exists and is available on the of...
Learnt from: AlexeyKrasnoperov
PR: ChainSafe/filecoin-benchmark-suite#2
File: package.json:19-19
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T14:03:44.246Z
Learning: The npm package chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder version 0.1.0 exists and is available on the official npm registry at https://registry.npmjs.org/chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder/-/filecoin-requests-builder-0.1.0.tgz

Applied to files:

  • Makefile
🪛 checkmake (0.2.2)
Makefile

[warning] 16-16: Missing required phony target "all"

(minphony)


[warning] 16-16: Missing required phony target "clean"

(minphony)


[warning] 16-16: Missing required phony target "test"

(minphony)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
Makefile (1)

13-16: Confirm whether other targets should depend on build-requests
build-requests correctly wraps yarn build-requests, but none of the K6 targets invoke it. If tests depend on an up-to-date methods/requests.json, consider making the “all-*” targets depend on build-requests, or at least documenting that order in the README.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
utils/loadRequests.js (2)

3-4: Consider adding JSON structure validation.

The file reading and parsing logic is correct, but consider validating that the parsed JSON contains the expected structure (e.g., has request definitions) to provide clearer error messages if the file format is invalid.

 try {
-  return JSON.parse(open(resolvedPath));
+  const requests = JSON.parse(open(resolvedPath));
+  if (!Array.isArray(requests) && typeof requests !== 'object') {
+    throw new Error('Invalid requests format: expected object or array');
+  }
+  return requests;
 } catch (err) {

15-24: Reduce code duplication in error messages.

The error handling logic is sound, but there's significant duplication between the missing file and general error messages. Consider extracting the common regeneration instructions to improve maintainability.

+  const regenerationInstructions = `
+To ${err.message.includes('no such file') ? 'generate' : 're-generate'} this file, run:
+  K6_RPC_URL=http://localhost:2345/rpc/v1 yarn build-requests
+
+Replace 'http://localhost:2345/rpc/v1' with your actual RPC URL if different.
+`;
+
   if (err instanceof Error && err.message.includes('no such file or directory')) {
     console.error(`
 ❌ Missing file: ${resolvedPath}
-
-To generate this file, run:
-  K6_RPC_URL=http://localhost:2345/rpc/v1 yarn build-requests
-
-Replace 'http://localhost:2345/rpc/v1' with your actual RPC URL if different.
+${regenerationInstructions}
 `);
   } else {
     console.error(`
 ❌ Error reading ${resolvedPath}: ${err.message}
-
-To re-generate this file, run:
-  K6_RPC_URL=http://localhost:2345/rpc/v1 yarn build-requests
-
-Replace 'http://localhost:2345/rpc/v1' with your actual RPC URL if different.
+${regenerationInstructions}
 `);
   }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc11acb and 843fbd1.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • tests/all.js (1 hunks)
  • tests/single_method.js (1 hunks)
  • utils/loadRequests.js (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • tests/single_method.js
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • tests/all.js
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: AlexeyKrasnoperov
PR: ChainSafe/filecoin-benchmark-suite#2
File: package.json:19-19
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T14:03:44.246Z
Learning: The npm package chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder exists and is publicly available on the npm registry at https://www.npmjs.com/package/chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder
Learnt from: AlexeyKrasnoperov
PR: ChainSafe/filecoin-benchmark-suite#2
File: package.json:19-19
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T14:03:44.246Z
Learning: The npm package chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder version 0.1.0 exists and is available on the official npm registry at https://registry.npmjs.org/chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder/-/filecoin-requests-builder-0.1.0.tgz
📚 Learning: the npm package @chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder exists and is publicly available on the npm reg...
Learnt from: AlexeyKrasnoperov
PR: ChainSafe/filecoin-benchmark-suite#2
File: package.json:19-19
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T14:03:44.246Z
Learning: The npm package chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder exists and is publicly available on the npm registry at https://www.npmjs.com/package/chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder

Applied to files:

  • utils/loadRequests.js
📚 Learning: the npm package @chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder version 0.1.0 exists and is available on the of...
Learnt from: AlexeyKrasnoperov
PR: ChainSafe/filecoin-benchmark-suite#2
File: package.json:19-19
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T14:03:44.246Z
Learning: The npm package chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder version 0.1.0 exists and is available on the official npm registry at https://registry.npmjs.org/chainsafe/filecoin-requests-builder/-/filecoin-requests-builder-0.1.0.tgz

Applied to files:

  • utils/loadRequests.js
🔇 Additional comments (4)
utils/loadRequests.js (4)

1-1: Function signature looks good!

The export, naming, and default parameter are well-structured and align with the PR's objective of loading dynamically generated request definitions.


2-2: Path resolution is correctly implemented.

Using import.meta.resolve is the appropriate way to handle relative path resolution in ES modules and k6 runtime.


6-14: Excellent user experience with helpful error messages.

The missing file detection and error message provide clear, actionable instructions for users. The formatting with emojis and step-by-step guidance enhances usability.

Note: The error detection relies on string matching which could be platform-dependent, but this is likely the most practical approach available in this context.


26-27: Proper error handling approach.

Rethrowing the original error after logging user-friendly messages is the correct approach, maintaining both good UX and proper error propagation for calling code.

Copy link

@hanabi1224 hanabi1224 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Once nit: the .gitignore file can be generated by https://www.toptal.com/developers/gitignore/api/osx,node,yarn,visualstudiocode

@AlexeyKrasnoperov AlexeyKrasnoperov merged commit 2843ec7 into main Aug 8, 2025
1 check passed
@AlexeyKrasnoperov AlexeyKrasnoperov deleted the use-requests-builder branch August 8, 2025 08:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants