Adding two properties for "process has first/last instant"#862
Adding two properties for "process has first/last instant"#862giacomodecolle wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
|
@giacomodecolle Did you see the guidance here by chance: https://github.com/CommonCoreOntology/CommonCoreOntologies/blob/develop/documentation/contributing/registering%20IRIs.md There is an IRI registry branch here: https://github.com/CommonCoreOntology/CommonCoreOntologies/tree/iri-registry-branch I agree that shrink-wrapped occupation should be functional. |
|
Updated the axioms and IRIs, do they go in a separate PR? |
|
@giacomodecolle |
| rdfs:domain obo:BFO_0000015 ; | ||
| rdfs:range obo:BFO_0000203 ; | ||
| rdfs:label "process has first instant"@en ; | ||
| skos:definition "x process_has_first_instant y iff x is an instance of Process and y is an instance of Temporal Instant and z is an instance of Temporal Region and y is first_instant_of z, and x occupies_temporal_region z."@en ; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Prefer:
x process_has_first_instant y Def= x is a Process, y is a Temporal Instant, and there is some Temporal Region z such that, y is first_instant_of z, and x occupies_temporal_region z.
| rdfs:domain obo:BFO_0000015 ; | ||
| rdfs:range obo:BFO_0000203 ; | ||
| rdfs:label "process has last instant"@en ; | ||
| skos:definition "x has_last_instant y iff x is an instance of Process and y is an instance of Temporal Instant and z is an instance of Temporal Region and y is last_instant_of z, and x occupies_temporal_region z."@en ; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Prefer:
x has_last_instant y Def= x is a Process, y is a Temporal Instant, and there is some Temporal Region z such that y is last_instant_of z, and x occupies_temporal_region z.
Solves #605
I would appreciate some guidance on how to mint IRIs, I wasn't able to find any in the repo. Similarly to see if this is following other CCO contribution guidelines that I might not be aware of.
Regarding the two properties, I would also like to change the definition to says something along the lines of "x exactly occupies_temporal_region z", that is, to say that the temporal extent of process x is exactly the temporal extent of temporal region z.
It also sounds reasonable to me that this relation should be functional.