Skip to content

Conversation

Snipy7374
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary

Checklist

  • If code changes were made, then they have been tested
    • I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes
    • I have formatted the code properly by running pdm lint
    • I have type-checked the code by running pdm pyright
  • This PR fixes an issue
  • This PR adds something new (e.g. new method or parameters)
  • This PR is a breaking change (e.g. methods or parameters removed/renamed)
  • This PR is not a code change (e.g. documentation, README, ...)

Snipy7374

This comment was marked as off-topic.

return 1 << 3

@flag_value
def contains_explicit_media(self):
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thoughts on calling this something different? Like is_nsfw or is_explicit

"""

@flag_value
def contains_explicit_media(self):
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thoughts on calling this something different? Like is_nsfw or is_explicit

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think following the API naming is okay

Comment on lines +274 to +284
if self._thumbnail and (thumbnail_flags := self._thumbnail.get("flags")):
self._thumbnail["flags"] = EmbedMediaFlags._from_value(thumbnail_flags) # type: ignore

self._video = data.get("video")
self._provider = data.get("provider")
self._author = data.get("author")

self._image = data.get("image")
if self._image and (image_flags := self._image.get("flags")):
self._image["flags"] = EmbedMediaFlags._from_value(image_flags) # type: ignore

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't like how this is done but I don't see much alternatives

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rather than save it here, we could make the flags when we access the image or thumbnail, no?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This also no longer seems to be respected in serialisation.

@Snipy7374 Snipy7374 added t: enhancement New feature t: api support Support of Discord API features s: waiting for api/docs Issue/PR is waiting for API support/documentation labels Jan 31, 2025
@Snipy7374 Snipy7374 requested review from Enegg and shiftinv and removed request for Enegg August 22, 2025 09:25
@onerandomusername onerandomusername added this to the disnake v2.11 milestone Sep 7, 2025
Co-authored-by: Eneg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: arielle <[email protected]>
@onerandomusername onerandomusername removed the s: waiting for api/docs Issue/PR is waiting for API support/documentation label Sep 9, 2025
@shiftinv shiftinv removed this from the disnake v2.11 milestone Sep 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
t: api support Support of Discord API features t: enhancement New feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support Embed and new Attachment flags
4 participants