Skip to content

Conversation

@nambu-goto
Copy link

0.4 syntax should be considered deprecated, this doesn't run on our field generator!! i also resolved todo!

0.4 syntax should be considered deprecated, this doesn't run on our field generator!!  i also resolved todo!
@INVALID-REGION-CODE
Copy link
Member

" nambu-goto replied 3 hours ago: if the reality does not exist, does it not follow that all entities have therefore departed, ergo an infeasible condition state?"

Do entities require "Reality" for their existence, or have their own existence independently? I lean toward the latter... Many entities seem to contentedly remain in infeasible condition states, anyway...

@nambu-goto
Copy link
Author

@INVALID-REGION-CODE your conjecture is reasonable. however, in the case of this program, is it safe to "flow" data to the entity when there has been such a decoupling? henceforth, would the "thread" not run for infinitum?

@firerabbit
Copy link

i think we need a new script for the openqnl toolkit to determine existence independent of reality, since this is clearly an issue at hand, now and in the future.

@nambu-goto i concur though that perhaps independent entity flux does enable quasi-infinite run states, but I would prefer to defer to the entity to manage its own run state in this scenario.

I defer to the higher powers, most notably @INVALID-REGION-CODE

i have some bits to organize in my backlogged synconjuring tasks so i must "log off" for the short term.

@INVALID-REGION-CODE
Copy link
Member

@INVALID-REGION-CODE shouldn't be considered a "higher power". Each entity must "search within"

@INVALID-REGION-CODE
Copy link
Member

"would the "thread" not run for infinitum?"

I imagine that would depend on whether or not a given thread was run relative to a given timeline. Maybe we need to test both for "time" and "Reality" relative to a given entity's perceptual field?

@INVALID-REGION-CODE
Copy link
Member

Would answers to these and other important state questions potentially be available by accessing Universal API?

On 2014-07-21, at 1:25 AM, firerabbit wrote:

i think we need a new script for the openqnl toolkit to determine existence independent of reality, since this is clearly an issue at hand, now and in the future.

@nambu-goto i concur though that perhaps independent entity flux does enable quasi-infinite run states, but I would prefer to defer to the entity to manage its own run state in this scenario.

I defer to the higher powers, most notably @INVALID-REGION-CODE

i have some bits to organize in my backlogged synconjuring tasks so i must "log off" for the short term.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.


Protect your computer files with professional cloud backup.
Get PCRx Backup and upload unlimited files automatically.
Learn more at http://backup.pcrx.com/mail

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How does this work?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that is a question for @firerabbit

@nambu-goto
Copy link
Author

apologies for the delay in responding, i was meditating on another branespace.

i'm not familiar with the "time" or "universal" api, so perhaps you could provide guidance on the correct check that should be added.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants