Skip to content

GT++ Charge Packs seem woefully underpowered for their expense. Buff their capacity. #24785

Description

@ShyZShark

Your GTNH Discord Username

ShyZShark

Your Pack Version

2.8.4

Your Proposal

Rebalance the GT++ Charge Packs to align better to the expense required to make them.

Currently, the only justification anyone can make for why they store such a small amount of EU for their cost by the time you would ever make one, is perhaps convenience? When you compare that solution, to the Energy Buffers, or simply making that energy tier's Battery Buffer and Polarizer to charge your items, with access to Compressed Chests and Backpacks, storage isn't an issue.

EV Battery Buffer with Lapotron Crystals ~ 160 million EU, or 12.3 million with the Charge Pack.
IV Battery Buffer with Lapotronic Energy Orbs ~ 1.6 billion EU, or 49.2 million with the Charge Pack.

When you compare the cost of making these separate solutions, including the machines it takes to craft the Charge Packs themselves, these numbers make very little sense.

It's also inconsistent. Everything IV to UV, gives a larger charge than the actual "Batteries" required to craft them, while everything before IV gives less than half the charge of the required "Battery". Then the UHV Charge Pack might not as well even exist for it's cost if I'm doing my math right.

Your Goal

Making the cost / reward actually worth it. Currently, nothing will ever stop a player from placing 2 blocks in a small hole, charge their items, pick it up, and continue on.

It looks like the Charge Packs were meant to avoid that problem, but these things are all over the place. Players that also see the extreme loss in capacity early on, will likely ignore them for when they actually make more sense.

Your Vision

Actually make the GT++ Charge Packs something players seek out, as they're a neat idea. Currently, it seems most players, especially anyone before LuV see them as worthless.

Final Checklist

  • I have searched this issue tracker and there is nothing similar already. Posting on a closed issue saying I like this change please reconsider adding it will prompt us to investigate and reopen it once we confirm your report.
  • I understand this change request may not attract enough attention and thus not be implemented.
  • I understand this change request may be rejected due to other community members think it's inappropriate.
  • I believe this feature would make the pack better.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions