#8: remove yardstick

[slamao]

Close #8

[github-actions]

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                  Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
----------------------  -------  ------  -------  ------------------------------------------------------------------
R/calibrationProfile.R      147       0  100.00%
R/getEstimates.R            370      37  90.00%   213, 359-364, 405-409, 412-419, 422-429, 439-441, 450-452, 456-458
R/locf.R                     43       0  100.00%
R/PV.R                      134       0  100.00%
R/riskProfile.R             210       0  100.00%
R/sensSpec.R                 66       0  100.00%
R/utils.R                   164       0  100.00%
TOTAL                      1134      37  96.74%

Diff against main

Filename        Stmts    Miss  Cover
------------  -------  ------  --------
R/PV.R            -12       0  +100.00%
R/sensSpec.R       +2       0  +100.00%
R/utils.R         +20       0  +100.00%
TOTAL             +10       0  +0.03%

Results for commit: 4be0e01

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

[github-actions]

Unit Tests Summary

  1 files   7 suites   6s ⏱️
 36 tests 23 ✅ 13 💤 0 ❌
114 runs  89 ✅ 25 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 4be0e01.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[dhibar]

@slamao With this update I think you'd need to make the same changes to the nonParametricPV function like you did in PR #7 i.e. removing [1:(length(score) - 1)] and update the prevalence padding in threshold.data.

Maybe you already plan to do this as part of the merging (sorry I'm not very good at Github)

Otherwise I tested out the changes to the ppv/npv functions and it all looks reasonable!

[slamao]

@slamao With this update I think you'd need to make the same changes to the nonParametricPV function like you did in PR #7 i.e. removing [1:(length(score) - 1)] and update the prevalence padding in threshold.data.

Maybe you already plan to do this as part of the merging (sorry I'm not very good at Github)

Otherwise I tested out the changes to the ppv/npv functions and it all looks reasonable!

Thanks for testing it out :)
And yes, I firstly need to merge the updated main branch into this branch (see above) and merge this PR only afterwards.