Draft
Conversation
Author
|
Apparently while fixing my problem this breaks other stuff - should probably not be merged. |
Contributor
|
Sadly, how to link against the right library for This is also just a dependency of the unit test. For using the library it shouldn't be needed. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It seems debian busters clang requires this change to the CMakeLists.txt file to link correctly.
I have set clang via update-alternatives and changed this file, then it worked.
I also installed clang-11 backport to buster but if I interpret cmake output correctly it used the normal system version of clang 7.0.1..
All of this may be obsolete with the next debian stable version appearing in about a week I think, so it may be reasonable to ignore this pull request if the new debian release fixes this and this pull request may cause other problems down the line (though I don't see why it should).