[HS-6944] Fix for deepseek distill models #359
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nazneenn
requested review from
afierka-intel,
jikunshang,
kzawora-intel,
madamczyk-intel,
mgawarkiewicz-intel,
michalkuligowski,
mswiniarsk,
tzielinski-habana and
xuechendi
as code owners
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In the current v1.22.0 release and in the future branch, deepseek distill model fails because it incorrectly falls into the DeepSeek if condition and triggers expert parallelism, which results in the error: “Value error, Number of experts in the model must be greater than 0 when expert parallelism is enabled.”
The proposed fix should remove this dependency for DeepSeek distill models and ensures that expert parallelism is enabled only for DeepSeek models.