-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6k
Optimize sorted() for primitive-type arrays
#5419
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
pubiqq
wants to merge
1
commit into
JetBrains:master
Choose a base branch
from
pubiqq:stdlib/optimize-sorted
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Previously,
asList()function was invoked on aArray<T>, now it is invoked on a corresponding primitive array.The change is subtle, but it results in different underlying types of the resulting list. Further analysis is required to determine how this change may affect users. For example, some codebases may rely on the fact that the resulting list is effectively mutable and explicitly cast it to
MutableList<T>. Changed underlying type may also affect call sites where a list produced by thesorted()call is used. This need to be investigated further.Besides these potential issues, there is a less ephemeral one:
PrimitiveArray.asList()returns a wrapper around the primitive array (for example,kotlin/libraries/stdlib/jvm/src/generated/_ArraysJvm.kt
Line 167 in bf92d5d
As a middle ground,
sortedmay convert sorted primitive array into a typed array first and then invokeasListon it (sortedArray().toTypedArray().asList()). Such an implementation outperforms the existing one (by saving time on sorting itself), but returns exactly the same list type as before.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The benchmark results (https://github.com/pubiqq/benchmarks-kmp/tree/list-get-benchmarks) do not allow us to state this unequivocally, in most cases accessing a primitive from
PrimitiveArray.asList()is faster than fromPrimitiveArray.toTypedArray().asList().It should also be noted that
toTypedArray()boxes primitives too. Yes, it does this preemptively, but it does this for all elements, and this is not always better than using a list that converts primitives on demand.Such an implementation also performs two array copy operations instead of one. I'm not sure it's worth it.