Add Missing Return Type Annotations to Custom Order Fees Interface#96
Merged
JosephLeedy merged 2 commits intomainfrom Nov 26, 2025
Merged
Add Missing Return Type Annotations to Custom Order Fees Interface#96JosephLeedy merged 2 commits intomainfrom
JosephLeedy merged 2 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
Fixes "Method's return type must be specified using @return annotation" error. Fixes #94. A huge thanks to [@avstaylime](https://github.com/avstaylime) for reporting this issue and providing a patch to resolve it.
Code Coverage Report: 2025-11-24 22:08:57 Summary: Classes: 30.77% (20/65) Methods: 51.63% (111/215) Lines: 78.03% (1616/2071) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Block\Adminhtml\CustomOrderFees\Report Methods: 100.00% ( 2/ 2) Lines: 100.00% ( 16/ 16) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Block\Adminhtml\CustomOrderFees\Report\Filter\Form\CustomOrderFees Methods: 0.00% ( 0/ 1) Lines: 97.73% ( 43/ 44) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Block\Adminhtml\CustomOrderFees\Report\Grid Methods: 100.00% ( 4/ 4) Lines: 100.00% (164/164) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Block\Adminhtml\CustomOrderFees\Report\Grid\Column\Renderer\Currency\LocalizedFeeAmount Methods: 100.00% ( 2/ 2) Lines: 100.00% ( 20/ 20) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Block\Adminhtml\Sales\Order\Creditmemo\Create\Totals Methods: 40.00% ( 2/ 5) Lines: 75.00% ( 39/ 52) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Block\Sales\Order\Creditmemo\Totals Methods: 66.67% ( 2/ 3) Lines: 94.74% ( 36/ 38) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Block\Sales\Order\Invoice\Totals Methods: 66.67% ( 2/ 3) Lines: 93.02% ( 40/ 43) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Block\Sales\Order\Totals Methods: 66.67% ( 2/ 3) Lines: 93.33% ( 28/ 30) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Block\System\Config\Form\Field\CustomFees\Advanced\Form Methods: 50.00% ( 3/ 6) Lines: 84.62% ( 77/ 91) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Controller\Adminhtml\Config\Export\ExampleCsv Methods: 100.00% ( 3/ 3) Lines: 100.00% ( 16/ 16) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Controller\Adminhtml\Report\CustomOrderFees Methods: 75.00% ( 3/ 4) Lines: 80.56% ( 29/ 36) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Controller\Adminhtml\Report\CustomOrderFees\Export\Csv Methods: 100.00% ( 1/ 1) Lines: 100.00% ( 4/ 4) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Controller\Adminhtml\Report\CustomOrderFees\Export\Excel Methods: 100.00% ( 1/ 1) Lines: 100.00% ( 4/ 4) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Controller\Adminhtml\System\Config\CustomFees\Advanced\Form Methods: 100.00% ( 2/ 2) Lines: 100.00% ( 20/ 20) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Controller\Adminhtml\System\Config\CustomFees\Advanced\NewConditionHtml Methods: 50.00% ( 1/ 2) Lines: 82.76% ( 24/ 29) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Model\Checkout\ConfigProvider\CustomFees Methods: 50.00% ( 1/ 2) Lines: 80.00% ( 8/ 10) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Model\Config Methods: 50.00% ( 1/ 2) Lines: 79.55% ( 35/ 44) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Model\Config\Backend\File\ImportCustomFees Methods: 80.00% ( 4/ 5) Lines: 93.14% ( 95/102) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Model\CustomOrderFees Methods: 63.64% ( 7/11) Lines: 73.91% ( 34/ 46) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Model\CustomOrderFeesRepository Methods: 33.33% ( 2/ 6) Lines: 33.33% ( 15/ 45) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Model\FeeStatus Methods: 50.00% ( 1/ 2) Lines: 42.86% ( 3/ 7) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Model\FeeType Methods: 33.33% ( 1/ 3) Lines: 27.27% ( 3/ 11) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Model\ResourceModel\CustomOrderFees Methods: 75.00% ( 3/ 4) Lines: 50.00% ( 7/ 14) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Model\ResourceModel\CustomOrderFees\Collection Methods: 100.00% ( 1/ 1) Lines: 100.00% ( 1/ 1) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Model\ResourceModel\Report\CustomOrderFees Methods: 75.00% ( 3/ 4) Lines: 77.78% ( 42/ 54) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Model\ResourceModel\Report\CustomOrderFees\Collection Methods: 75.00% ( 3/ 4) Lines: 94.29% ( 33/ 35) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Model\Rule\Condition\Combine Methods: 100.00% ( 2/ 2) Lines: 100.00% ( 47/ 47) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Model\Rule\Condition\Product Methods: 0.00% ( 0/ 1) Lines: 66.67% ( 2/ 3) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Model\Rule\Condition\Quote Methods: 20.00% ( 1/ 5) Lines: 27.78% ( 5/ 18) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Model\Rule\Condition\QuoteAddress Methods: 71.43% ( 5/ 7) Lines: 86.84% ( 33/ 38) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Model\Rule\CustomFees Methods: 50.00% ( 2/ 4) Lines: 86.67% ( 13/ 15) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Model\Sales\Pdf\CustomFees Methods: 50.00% ( 2/ 4) Lines: 94.74% ( 36/ 38) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Model\Total\Creditmemo\CustomFees Methods: 75.00% ( 3/ 4) Lines: 78.95% ( 75/ 95) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Model\Total\Invoice\CustomFees Methods: 100.00% ( 2/ 2) Lines: 100.00% ( 28/ 28) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Model\Total\Quote\CustomFees Methods: 50.00% ( 2/ 4) Lines: 81.67% ( 49/ 60) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Observer\AddFieldToProductAttributeEditForm Methods: 100.00% ( 2/ 2) Lines: 100.00% ( 16/ 16) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Observer\BeforeQuoteSubmitObserver Methods: 50.00% ( 1/ 2) Lines: 91.67% ( 11/ 12) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Plugin\Framework\View\Element\UiComponent\DataProvider\CollectionFactoryPlugin Methods: 100.00% ( 2/ 2) Lines: 100.00% ( 13/ 13) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Plugin\Framework\View\Element\UiComponent\DataProvider\DataProviderPlugin Methods: 50.00% ( 1/ 2) Lines: 90.62% ( 29/ 32) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Plugin\Quote\Api\Data\TotalsInterfacePlugin Methods: 100.00% ( 2/ 2) Lines: 100.00% ( 28/ 28) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Plugin\Reports\Model\ResourceModel\Refresh\CollectionPlugin Methods: 100.00% ( 2/ 2) Lines: 100.00% ( 20/ 20) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Plugin\Sales\Api\CreditmemoRepositoryInterfacePlugin Methods: 100.00% ( 2/ 2) Lines: 100.00% ( 23/ 23) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Plugin\Sales\Api\OrderRepositoryInterfacePlugin Methods: 100.00% ( 3/ 3) Lines: 100.00% ( 21/ 21) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Plugin\Sales\Block\Order\TotalsPlugin Methods: 100.00% ( 2/ 2) Lines: 100.00% ( 25/ 25) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Plugin\Sales\Model\Convert\OrderPlugin Methods: 100.00% ( 3/ 3) Lines: 100.00% ( 6/ 6) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Plugin\Sales\Model\Order\InvoicePlugin Methods: 100.00% ( 2/ 2) Lines: 100.00% ( 25/ 25) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Plugin\Ui\Component\AbstractComponentPlugin Methods: 50.00% ( 1/ 2) Lines: 93.88% ( 46/ 49) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Service\ConditionsApplier Methods: 33.33% ( 1/ 3) Lines: 78.57% ( 11/ 14) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Service\ConfigUpdater Methods: 42.86% ( 3/ 7) Lines: 82.76% ( 48/ 58) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Service\CustomFeesRetriever Methods: 40.00% ( 2/ 5) Lines: 90.62% ( 29/ 32) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Service\InvoicedCustomFeesRecorder Methods: 66.67% ( 2/ 3) Lines: 98.25% ( 56/ 57) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Service\RefundedCustomFeesRecorder Methods: 100.00% ( 3/ 3) Lines: 100.00% ( 57/ 57) JosephLeedy\CustomFees\Setup\Patch\Data\AddFieldsToCustomOrderFeesPatch Methods: 25.00% ( 1/ 4) Lines: 90.32% ( 28/ 31) |
Owner
Author
|
I cannot get the functional tests to pass for Luma in GHA, but they do pass locally. I don't think that the issue is related to the changes made by this pull request, so I am going to mark this as "Ready to Merge." |
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes "Method's return type must be specified using
@returnannotation" error.Fixes #94. A huge thanks to @avstaylime for reporting this issue and providing a patch to resolve it. 👏🏽