[WIP] Set manager_ref to file path for embedded ConfigurationScripts #711

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Open

agrare wants to merge 1 commit into ManageIQ:master from agrare:set_manager_ref_embedded_configuration_scripts

Member

agrare commented Nov 14, 2023 •

edited

Loading

The manager_ref is typically used to track the "unique" attribute of an object, for ansible_tower/awx the manager_ref is the job_template.id but for embedded_ansible the manager_ref was nil and the name was set to the file path.

Embedded Workflows copied this behavior, but it would be preferable to match how the "external" automation managers operate and also open up the :name column for a more user friendly name.

agrare changed the title ~~[WIP] Set manager_ref to file path for embedded scripts~~ [WIP] Set manager_ref to file path for embedded ConfigurationScripts

miq-bot added the wip label


          Set manager_ref to file path for embedded scripts

3e33249

The manager_ref is typically used to track the "unique" attribute of an
object, for ansible_tower/awx the manager_ref is the job_template.id but
for embedded_ansible the manager_ref was nil and the name was set to the
file path.  Embedded Workflows copied this behavior, but it would be
preferable to match how the "external" automation managers operate and
also open up the `:name` column for a more user friendly name.

agrare force-pushed the set_manager_ref_embedded_configuration_scripts branch from 5ee9c1d to 3e33249 Compare

November 14, 2023 17:37

Member

miq-bot commented Nov 14, 2023

Checked commit agrare@3e33249 with ruby 2.6.10, rubocop 1.28.2, haml-lint 0.35.0, and yamllint
2 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 🏆

miq-bot added the stale label

Member

miq-bot commented Feb 19, 2024

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If these changes are still valid, please remove the stale label, make any changes requested by reviewers (if any), and ensure that this issue is being looked at by the assigned/reviewer(s).

5 similar comments

Member

miq-bot commented May 20, 2024

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If these changes are still valid, please remove the stale label, make any changes requested by reviewers (if any), and ensure that this issue is being looked at by the assigned/reviewer(s).

Member

miq-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If these changes are still valid, please remove the stale label, make any changes requested by reviewers (if any), and ensure that this issue is being looked at by the assigned/reviewer(s).

Member

miq-bot commented Dec 9, 2024

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If these changes are still valid, please remove the stale label, make any changes requested by reviewers (if any), and ensure that this issue is being looked at by the assigned/reviewer(s).

Member

miq-bot commented Apr 14, 2025

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If these changes are still valid, please remove the stale label, make any changes requested by reviewers (if any), and ensure that this issue is being looked at by the assigned/reviewer(s).

Member

miq-bot commented Jul 21, 2025

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If these changes are still valid, please remove the stale label, make any changes requested by reviewers (if any), and ensure that this issue is being looked at by the assigned/reviewer(s).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels